Next message: Internet-Drafts@ietf.org: "I-D ACTION:draft-ietf-deltav-versioning-04.txt"
To: ietf-dav-versioning@w3.org
Message-ID: <OF48C4C3F8.FDED6100-ON852568A4.007353B7@ott.oti.com>
From: "Tim Ellison/OTT/OTI" <Tim_Ellison@oti.com>
Date: Thu, 16 Mar 2000 16:00:59 -0500
Subject: RE: MKRESOURCE response
I'm assuming that if you don't specify a resource type at all that would be
an overall
400 Bad Request
Tim
Tim Ellison
To: "Matt Bisson" <mbisson@Rational.Com>
16-03-00 03:25 cc: ietf-dav-versioning@w3.org
PM Subject: RE: MKRESOURCE response(Document link: Tim
Ellison)
That would imply that MKRESOURCE itself was not allowed.
Tim
"Matt Bisson"
<mbisson@Rati To: "Tim Ellison/OTT/OTI" <Tim_Ellison@oti.com>
onal.Com> cc:
Subject: RE: MKRESOURCE response
16-03-00
03:11 PM
What about 405 Method Not Allowed?
-----Original Message-----
From: ietf-dav-versioning-request@w3.org
[mailto:ietf-dav-versioning-request@w3.org] On Behalf Of Tim
Ellison/OTT/OTI
Sent: Thursday, March 16, 2000 2:56 PM
To: ietf-dav-versioning@w3.org
Subject: MKRESOURCE response
What would you expect a MKRESOURCE request to return if it includes a
resource type that the server does not support?
403 Forbidden seem the most likely candidate.
Tim