RE: MKRESOURCE response

From: Tim Ellison/OTT/OTI (Tim_Ellison@oti.com)
Date: Thu, Mar 16 2000

  • Next message: Tim Ellison/OTT/OTI: "RE: MKRESOURCE response"

    To: "Matt Bisson" <mbisson@Rational.Com>
    Cc: ietf-dav-versioning@w3.org
    Message-ID: <OFD7387161.E8C73067-ON852568A4.00702175@ott.oti.com>
    From: "Tim Ellison/OTT/OTI" <Tim_Ellison@oti.com>
    Date: Thu, 16 Mar 2000 15:25:11 -0500
    Subject: RE: MKRESOURCE response
    
    
    That would imply that MKRESOURCE itself was not allowed.
    
    Tim
    
    
    
                                                                                                       
                        "Matt Bisson"                                                                  
                        <mbisson@Rati        To:     "Tim Ellison/OTT/OTI" <Tim_Ellison@oti.com>       
                        onal.Com>            cc:                                                       
                                             Subject:     RE: MKRESOURCE response                      
                        16-03-00                                                                       
                        03:11 PM                                                                       
                                                                                                       
                                                                                                       
    
    
    
    What about 405 Method Not Allowed?
    
    -----Original Message-----
    From:           ietf-dav-versioning-request@w3.org
    [mailto:ietf-dav-versioning-request@w3.org] On Behalf Of Tim
    Ellison/OTT/OTI
    Sent:           Thursday, March 16, 2000 2:56 PM
    To:        ietf-dav-versioning@w3.org
    Subject:        MKRESOURCE response
    
    What would you expect a MKRESOURCE request to return if it includes a
    resource type that the server does not support?
    
    403 Forbidden seem the most likely candidate.
    
    Tim