RE: DAV:revision-resourcetype

From: Tim Ellison OTT (Tim_Ellison@oti.com)
Date: Fri, Jan 21 2000

  • Next message: Neil Weber: "RE: Brad Sergeant"

    From: Tim_Ellison@oti.com (Tim Ellison OTT)
    To: geoffrey.clemm@rational.com (Geoffrey M. Clemm), ietf-dav-versioning@w3.org (ietf-dav-versioning)
    Message-ID: <2000Jan21.105400.1250.1452211@otismtp.ott.oti.com>
    Date: Fri, 21 Jan 2000 11:00:36 -0500
    Subject: RE: DAV:revision-resourcetype
    
    
    In what instances would you expect DAV:resourcetype to be different to 
    DAV:revision-resourcetype ?
    
    Tim
     ----------
    >From: Geoffrey M. Clemm
    >To: ietf-dav-versioning
    >Subject: DAV:revision-resourcetype
    >Date: Thursday, January 20, 2000 10:48PM
    >
    ><<File Attachment: HEADER.TXT>>
    >
    >Most versioning systems require that you tell it what kind of
    >versioned resource you want to create, when you create one.
    >This means that to use MKRESOURCE, we need to be able to specify,
    >on creation of a versioned resource, the DAV:resourcetype of the
    >revisions of that versioned resource.
    >
    >I propose that we introduce a DAV:revision-resourcetype property
    >on a versioned resource in order to do so.
    >
    >Comments?
    >
    >Cheers,
    >Geoff
    >
    >