Next message: Tim Ellison OTT: "RE: DAV:revision-resourcetype"
From: Tim_Ellison@oti.com (Tim Ellison OTT)
To: ietf-dav-versioning@w3.org (ietf-dav-versioning)
Message-ID: <2000Jan21.101600.1250.1452105@otismtp.ott.oti.com>
Date: Fri, 21 Jan 2000 10:22:40 -0500
Subject: RE: DAV:resourceid vs. DAV:versioned-res
Agreed.
----------
>From: Geoffrey M. Clemm
>To: ietf-dav-versioning
>Subject: DAV:resourceid vs. DAV:versioned-resour
>Date: Thursday, January 20, 2000 11:18PM
>
>I propose that we just use require that a versioned resource
>have a DAV:resourceid (as defined in the BINDING protocol),
>rather than introducing a new DAV:versioned-resource-id.
>
>I further propose (as suggested by someone earlier) that we
>require that the DAV:resourceid of a working resource or revision
>be the DAV:resourceid of its versioned resource.
>
>Comments?
>
>Cheers,
>Geoff
>
>