Re: workspaces as collections

From: Geoffrey M. Clemm (geoffrey.clemm@rational.com)
Date: Wed, May 31 2000

  • Next message: Tim Ellison/OTT/OTI: "LOCK and versioned resources"

    Date: Wed, 31 May 2000 17:34:12 -0400 (EDT)
    Message-Id: <200005312134.RAA25772@tantalum.atria.com>
    From: "Geoffrey M. Clemm" <geoffrey.clemm@rational.com>
    To: ietf-dav-versioning@w3.org
    Subject: Re: workspaces as collections
    
    
       From: jamsden@us.ibm.com
    
       <tim/> Given that we are allowed to define the (opaque) working
       resource id to look like a URL, there is nothing to stop the server
       using the working resource URL as its id, so let's drop the working
       resource id and simplify the description.
    
       <jra> I think this is what I was missing, using the working
       resource or revision URL in the Target-Selector. If that is the
       plan, then I'm all for it.
       </jra>
    
    OK, it looks like we're almost there.  The last step is to realize
    that once you have a working resource URL or revision URL, you just
    use it as the request URL.  The versioned resource URL is irrelevant
    (or at least, redundant) once you have a working resource URL or
    revision URL for use as the request-URL, so there is no reason to
    encumber the request with a Target-Selector header.  It also allows us
    to get rid of the Destination-Target-Selector header altogether.
    
    Cheers,
    Geoff