Date: Wed, 31 May 2000 17:34:12 -0400 (EDT) Message-Id: <200005312134.RAA25772@tantalum.atria.com> From: "Geoffrey M. Clemm" <geoffrey.clemm@rational.com> To: ietf-dav-versioning@w3.org Subject: Re: workspaces as collections From: jamsden@us.ibm.com <tim/> Given that we are allowed to define the (opaque) working resource id to look like a URL, there is nothing to stop the server using the working resource URL as its id, so let's drop the working resource id and simplify the description. <jra> I think this is what I was missing, using the working resource or revision URL in the Target-Selector. If that is the plan, then I'm all for it. </jra> OK, it looks like we're almost there. The last step is to realize that once you have a working resource URL or revision URL, you just use it as the request URL. The versioned resource URL is irrelevant (or at least, redundant) once you have a working resource URL or revision URL for use as the request-URL, so there is no reason to encumber the request with a Target-Selector header. It also allows us to get rid of the Destination-Target-Selector header altogether. Cheers, Geoff