From: "Jim Doubek" <jdoubek@macromedia.com> To: "Tim Ellison/OTT/OTI" <Tim_Ellison@oti.com>, <ietf-dav-versioning@w3.org> Date: Wed, 3 May 2000 14:11:31 -0700 Message-ID: <NEBBKGCJHMKNLDINHHCEGEMHCBAA.jdoubek@macromedia.com> Subject: RE: Labels <jimd> Using SET_TARGET to add a label is pretty non-intuitive to me. Using it to remove the label with <DAV:remove> is even less so. </jimd> - jim -----Original Message----- From: ietf-dav-versioning-request@w3.org [mailto:ietf-dav-versioning-request@w3.org]On Behalf Of Tim Ellison/OTT/OTI Sent: Wednesday, May 03, 2000 10:49 AM To: ietf-dav-versioning@w3.org Subject: Labels We seem to have lost the ability to remove a label using the 04.5 protocol. Example 6.2.2 should probably look like this: SET-TARGET /file HTTP/1.1 Host: ... Target-Selector: ... ... <?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" ?> <DAV:add> <DAV:label> <!-- maybe this is not needed, maybe useful for future --> mylabel </DAV:label> </DAV:add> (That would mean that you would use SET-TARGET to remove a label too). I would quite like to see the return of the LABEL method, it was quite intuative. Tim