From: jamsden@us.ibm.com To: ietf-dav-versioning@w3.org Message-ID: <852568D0.005521F0.00@d54mta03.raleigh.ibm.com> Date: Sat, 29 Apr 2000 11:14:34 -0400 Subject: Re: new "Advanced Versioning Semantics" section Geoff, Looks good. Just a couple of things. Some of these may have already been cleared up. I'm a little behind in my reading. It wasn't clear how the SET-TARGET method populated the workspace with revisions. Maybe just another sentence there would help. If core versioning uses a default revision on a versioned resource, wouldn't using a default workspace be in conflict with this? Wouldn't there be two defaults specified? Or are these merged by setting the default version of a versioned resource to a workspace rather than a label? If so, this should be pointed out so one can see how default workspaces don't introduce a new paradigm. It also wasn't clear how one would use different default workspaces on different resources, but noting that they are just a revision selector just like a label might clear up this confusion. I particularly liked the sections on merging and activities. Indicating merge conflicts arise when neither revision is a predecessor of the other is the simplest way I've ever heard this described. Thanks for the great work!