Re: new "Advanced Versioning Semantics" section

From: jamsden@us.ibm.com
Date: Sat, Apr 29 2000

  • Next message: Geoffrey M. Clemm: "Re: new "Advanced Versioning Semantics" section"

    From: jamsden@us.ibm.com
    To: ietf-dav-versioning@w3.org
    Message-ID: <852568D0.005521F0.00@d54mta03.raleigh.ibm.com>
    Date: Sat, 29 Apr 2000 11:14:34 -0400
    Subject: Re: new "Advanced Versioning Semantics" section
    
    
    
    Geoff,
    Looks good. Just a couple of things. Some of these may have already been
    cleared up. I'm a little behind in my reading.
    
    It wasn't clear how the SET-TARGET method populated the workspace with
    revisions. Maybe just another sentence there would help.
    
    If core versioning uses a default revision on a versioned resource,
    wouldn't using a default workspace be in conflict with this? Wouldn't there
    be two defaults specified? Or are these merged by setting the default
    version of a versioned resource to a workspace rather than a label? If so,
    this should be pointed out so one can see how default workspaces don't
    introduce a new paradigm. It also wasn't clear how one would use different
    default workspaces on different resources, but noting that they are just a
    revision selector just like a label might clear up this confusion.
    
    I particularly liked the sections on merging and activities. Indicating
    merge conflicts arise when neither revision is a predecessor of the other
    is the simplest way I've ever heard this described.
    
    Thanks for the great work!