To: ietf-dav-versioning@w3.org From: "Tim Ellison/OTT/OTI" <Tim_Ellison@oti.com> Message-ID: <OF917C84C7.4D0F5F77-ON852568CF.00094800@ott.oti.com> Date: Thu, 27 Apr 2000 22:48:34 -0400 Subject: Versioned Collections 9.4 Versioned Collections para. 1 There seems to be an unwritten subtext here<g>. Disallowing unversioned resources in a versioned collection is primarily for an (important) implementation optimization. Allowing any resource would break the semantics of the versioning system per se. I would be happier if this was more explicit. <geoff> I added the statement that "this is restriction is required to allow essential implementation optimizations". Probably don't want to spend too much space in the protocol on this issue though. Folks that are implementing them will appreciate the restriction, and folks that aren't probably don't care (:-). </geoff> I agree -- and for the record, (if it wasn't obvious) I missed the key word *not* out of the sentence: Allowing any resource would _not_ break the semantics of the versioning system per se. Tim