DAV:compare-report

From: Tim Ellison/OTT/OTI (Tim_Ellison@oti.com)
Date: Thu, Apr 27 2000

  • Next message: Tim Ellison/OTT/OTI: "DAV:revision-set"

    To: ietf-dav-versioning@w3.org
    From: "Tim Ellison/OTT/OTI" <Tim_Ellison@oti.com>
    Message-ID: <OFF9591311.F785EB9F-ON852568CF.000B19C1@ott.oti.com>
    Date: Thu, 27 Apr 2000 22:48:36 -0400
    Subject: DAV:compare-report
    
       14.4 DAV:compare-report
    
       Again, I would assume that the compare reports differences in terms of 
    the
       containers that were merged, rather than the individual revisions that 
    are
       selected by the entire workspace.  The alternative is a very expensive
       transitive walk of the entire namespace.
    
    <geoff>
    A server can decide how to structure the response, i.e. in terms of
    revisions, baselines, or even activities.  At some point we could define
    specific flavors of the DAV:compare-report, but we can probably hold off
    on that for now.
    </geoff>
    
    It would be good to point that out in the doc (i.e. that the report is 
    agnostic towards 'elements').  I agree that we need not specify sytles of 
    report, but I was left with the impression that it would be down to the 
    terminals (esp. based on protocol 04.4 section 12.4 sentence two).
    
    Tim