Next message: Geoffrey M. Clemm: "Re: working resource DAV:merge-state property?"
From: jamsden@us.ibm.com
To: ietf-dav-versioning@w3.org
Message-ID: <852568C0.00767213.00@d54mta03.raleigh.ibm.com>
Date: Thu, 13 Apr 2000 17:33:43 -0400
Subject: Re: OPTIONS method
We're working on it. The OPTIONS methods is the last thing we'll do because
we have to know all the versioning semantics and protocol in order to know
what the options are.
|------------------------+------------------------>
| | Ron Jacobs |
| | <rjacobs@gforce.com> |
| | (by way of "Ralph R. |
| | Swick" <swick |
| | Sent by: |
| | ietf-dav-versioning-r|
| | equest@w3.org |
| | |
| | 04/13/2000 03:02 PM |
| | |
|------------------------+------------------------>
>------------------------|
| |
| To: |
| ietf-dav-versioning@w|
| 3.org |
| cc: |
| Subject: |
| OPTIONS method |
>------------------------|
Date: Thu, 13 Apr 2000 13:26:32 -0400 (EDT)
Message-ID: <4927C2E1CD80D311A2C500A0CC516497060F6F@MAIL>
From: Ron Jacobs <rjacobs@gforce.com>
To: ietf-dav-versioning@w3.org
Shouldn't the DeltaV specification better specify capability discovery?
I am suggesting the inclusion of a section along the lines of section 17
of draft-ieft-webdav-binding-protocol-01. I do not see anything in 04.2
that specifies the response to an OPTIONS request.
Thanks, Ron