RE: Questions on activities

From: jamsden@us.ibm.com
Date: Tue, Apr 11 2000

  • Next message: Geoffrey M. Clemm: "Re: Questions on activities"

    From: jamsden@us.ibm.com
    To: ietf-dav-versioning@w3.org
    Message-ID: <852568BE.00589E3C.00@d54mta03.raleigh.ibm.com>
    Date: Tue, 11 Apr 2000 12:07:53 -0400
    Subject: RE: Questions on activities
    
    
    
    
    
    <john>
    Another reason to not require web servers to maintain mappings between URLs
    and CM resources is to allow for scaling up access by providing more web
    servers as access points for the same CM repositories.
    </john>
    <jra>
    What problem would this solve? Seem like if a CM repository has one WebDAV
    server that can access it, then any client can get to the resources managed
    by that repository. Implementation details for multiple threading and
    process load leveling should not appear in the protocol.
    </jra>