Re: Questions on activities

From: jamsden@us.ibm.com
Date: Tue, Apr 11 2000

  • Next message: jamsden@us.ibm.com: "Re: Initializing a new workspace using an RSR"

    From: jamsden@us.ibm.com
    To: ietf-dav-versioning@w3.org
    Message-ID: <852568BE.004291F8.00@d54mta03.raleigh.ibm.com>
    Date: Tue, 11 Apr 2000 08:07:03 -0400
    Subject: Re: Questions on activities
    
    
    
    
    
    <geoff>
    The majority of web servers (such as Apache and IIS) only handle a few
    top level name mappings, and hand the rest of the processing off to
    the underlying repository.  So it is reasonable to associate some
    collection with a class of metadata, and map the URL of that
    collection to the appropriate underlying repository, but this does not
    allow you to make arbitrary associations between URL's and different
    kinds of metadata potentially from different repositories.
    </geoff>
    <jra>
    This won't be true of WebDAV servers that support BIND. They will have to
    have much more support for mappings.
    </jra>
    
    While we are waiting for such WebDAV servers to be written, I'd like
    to make it possible to have implementations that are significantly
    simpler, and assume all but the top level name mappings are being
    maintained by the underlying repository.
    <jra>
    These are not repository semantics, but WebDAV binding and versioning
    semantics. The implementation shouldn't be in the repository managers as
    this would require repository managers to know and implement WebDAV
    semantics, something they shouldn't be expected to do.
    </jra>