MKRESOURCE vs. MKACTIVITY and MKWORKSPACE

From: Clemm, Geoff (gclemm@Rational.Com)
Date: Thu, Apr 06 2000

  • Next message: Geoffrey M. Clemm: "Re: Stable URLs"

    Message-ID: <65B141FB11CCD211825700A0C9D609BC025FA435@chef.lex.rational.com>
    From: "Clemm, Geoff" <gclemm@Rational.Com>
    To: "DeltaV (E-mail)" <ietf-dav-versioning@w3.org>
    Date: Thu, 6 Apr 2000 11:07:36 -0400 
    Subject: MKRESOURCE vs. MKACTIVITY and MKWORKSPACE
    
    The redirect reference design team decided to go with a
    MKREF method instead of using a generic MKRESOURCE method,
    because the semantics of MKRESOURCE is so heavily
    depedent on what type of resource is being created.
    
    I believe the same reasoning applies even more strongly
    to the new versioning resource types, so I propose that
    we replace the generic MKRESOURCE method in the versioning
    protocol with MKACTIVITY and MKWORKSPACE methods (and for
    those of you with long memories, yes, I was in fact the one
    lobbying the loudest for a generic MKxxx method way back
    when ... :-).
    
    The argument has also been made that a generic MKRESOURCE
    method is not compatible with existing extensibility 
    mechanisms in commonly used Web servers such as Apache and IIS.
    I don't thing this should be an overriding consideration,
    but it should be factored in.
    
    Comments?
    
    Cheers,
    Geoff