Message-ID: <65B141FB11CCD211825700A0C9D609BC025FA435@chef.lex.rational.com> From: "Clemm, Geoff" <gclemm@Rational.Com> To: "DeltaV (E-mail)" <ietf-dav-versioning@w3.org> Date: Thu, 6 Apr 2000 11:07:36 -0400 Subject: MKRESOURCE vs. MKACTIVITY and MKWORKSPACE The redirect reference design team decided to go with a MKREF method instead of using a generic MKRESOURCE method, because the semantics of MKRESOURCE is so heavily depedent on what type of resource is being created. I believe the same reasoning applies even more strongly to the new versioning resource types, so I propose that we replace the generic MKRESOURCE method in the versioning protocol with MKACTIVITY and MKWORKSPACE methods (and for those of you with long memories, yes, I was in fact the one lobbying the loudest for a generic MKxxx method way back when ... :-). The argument has also been made that a generic MKRESOURCE method is not compatible with existing extensibility mechanisms in commonly used Web servers such as Apache and IIS. I don't thing this should be an overriding consideration, but it should be factored in. Comments? Cheers, Geoff