To: ietf-dav-versioning@w3.org Message-ID: <OF43855075.54FE33E9-ON852568B6.0068DCC6@ott.oti.com> From: "Tim Ellison/OTT/OTI" <Tim_Ellison@oti.com> Date: Mon, 3 Apr 2000 15:08:18 -0400 Subject: Re: Stable Href's of collections Ah, but I think stable hrefs *are* useful, for various reasons, not least of which the stable href is the identity (urn) of the resource. Your suggestion of PROPFIND depth 1 on the versioned collection href, the getting the href of the versioned resource won't work since the versioned resource is also a stable href and cannot be parsed to extract it's members. Tim jamsden@us.ibm.com Sent by: To: ietf-dav-versioning@w3.org ietf-dav-versioning-requ cc: est@w3.org Subject: Re: Stable Href's of collections 03-04-00 01:29 PM Another indication these stable hrefs aren't that useful. They may enable non-versioning clients to do something with versioning meta-data, but it won't be easy. To get the members of the collection, a client would have to do a PROPFIND depth 1 on the versioned collection's stable href, examine all the href's in the result, do a PROPFIND on each one to get the href for the associated versioned resouce, and parse the URLs to extract the members. |------------------------+------------------------> | | "Tim Ellison/OTT/OTI"| | | <Tim_Ellison@oti.com>| | | Sent by: | | | ietf-dav-versioning-r| | | equest@w3.org | | | | | | 04/03/2000 12:39 PM | | | | |------------------------+------------------------> >------------------------| | | | To: | | ietf-dav-versioning@w| | 3.org | | cc: | | Subject: | | Stable Href's of | | collections | >------------------------| I seem to remember that we agreed that deep operations on a collection's stable Href would return responses in terms of stable Hrefs. Makes sense. Now, assume that I have a stable Href to a collection and would like to know the names of the collection's members. Previously I'd have used PROPFIND depth 1 on some property, and got the answer as a "side-effect", in the <href> tags. However, stable <href>'s cannot be used to extract the names. Hmm, Tim