- From: Martin Duerst <duerst@w3.org>
- Date: Fri, 12 Apr 2002 16:21:40 +0900
- To: (wrong string) ‹N(B <paf@cisco.com>, Misha.Wolf@reuters.com, Kenneth Whistler <kenw@sybase.com>
- Cc: ietf-charsets@iana.org
At 08:43 02/04/12 +0200, Patrik F$BgM(Btstr$B‹N(B wrote: >--On 2002-04-12 15.15 +0900 Martin Duerst <duerst@w3.org> wrote: > > > We could just point to Unicode 3.2, or to ISO. But we need > > the RFC anyway. > >In the IETF we normally point to ISO if possible. Sorry, I think I should have written 'and' rather than 'or'. >So, I, as AD, prefer a reference to the ISO standard. I think we should reference both, but ISO may be normative. Referencing both is important to tell people that the definitions are the same; otherwise, we don't help implementers. Regards, Martin.
Received on Friday, 12 April 2002 03:26:15 UTC