Re: RFC 2279 (UTF-8) to Full Standard from Patrik Fältström on 2002-04-12 (ietf-charsets@w3.org from April to June 2002)

From: Patrik Fältström <paf@cisco.com>
Date: Fri, 12 Apr 2002 08:43:41 +0200
To: Martin Duerst <duerst@w3.org>, Misha.Wolf@reuters.com, Kenneth Whistler <kenw@sybase.com>
Cc: ietf-charsets@iana.org
Message-id: <43140071.1018601021@localhost>

--On 2002-04-12 15.15 +0900 Martin Duerst <duerst@w3.org> wrote:

> We could just point to Unicode 3.2, or to ISO. But we need
> the RFC anyway.

In the IETF we normally point to ISO if possible.

So, I, as AD, prefer a reference to the ISO standard.

Yes, we need the RFC anyways, because of (at least) the reference. But, I
guess also because of security consideration section and a number of other
things.

   paf

Received on Friday, 12 April 2002 02:47:34 UTC