- From: Martin J. Duerst <duerst@w3.org>
- Date: Thu, 16 Dec 1999 15:27:41 +0900
- To: Ira Mcdonald <imcdonal@sdsp.mc.xerox.com>
- Cc: Harald@Alvestrand.no, ietf-charsets@iana.org
I think the distinction is not that important in this case, I could live with both. But it would be great to see this getting done soon. It has been a long time. Regards, Martin. At 23:31 1999/12/15 -0500, Ira Mcdonald wrote: > Hi folks, > > I agree with Harald's judgment that Informational and *not* > Proposed Standard is appropriate. The IETF has done a good > job of updating core IETF protocols to prefer or require > UTF-8. Over the wire, UTF-16 has a long list of drawbacks > and no visible advantages. It shouldn't be 'legitimized' > by IETF Proposed Standard designation. > > My two cents, > - Ira McDonald > High North Inc > > > #-#-# Martin J. Du"rst, World Wide Web Consortium #-#-# mailto:duerst@w3.org http://www.w3.org
Received on Thursday, 16 December 1999 01:52:41 UTC