- From: Martin J. Duerst <duerst@w3.org>
- Date: Wed, 25 Mar 1998 07:07:58 +0900
- To: erik@netscape.com, Marc Blanchet <Marc.Blanchet@viagenie.qc.ca>
- Cc: ietf-charsets@ISI.EDU, alb@sct.gouv.qc.ca
> cc: ietf-charsets@INNOSOFT.COM, ietf-charsets@iana.org Please do not crosspost. The official address is ietf-charsets@iana.org. The mail is still handled at Innosoft, but there is no need to crosspost, the two addresses get to exactly the same list. As for technical comments, I guess they would have looked quite similar to what Erik wrote, if I had sent something yesterday, but I think he did a better job than I could have done. The only correction I have is that according to my knowledge, the registration authority has changed from ECMA to somewhere in Japan. But I might be wrong, or that might not yet have happened. Regards, Martin. At 10:32 98/03/24 -0800, Erik van der Poel wrote: > Hello Marc, > > I have a couple of comments/questions: > > IANA charsets are case-insensitive. Therefore, "ISO-8859-15" and "iso-8859-15" are > the same. I would suggest deleting the alias "iso-8859-15" and putting the "preferred > MIME name" next to the "ISO-8859-15". > > The ISO-IR-203 number is for the "ISO International Register of Coded Character Sets > To Be Used With Escape Sequences", right? Have you actually received the paper update > via regular (snail) mail? Has anybody else received the update, and can you confirm > that the number is indeed 203? I have not received my copy of the update yet. > > What is the status of ISO-8859-15 in ISO itself? Is it still a draft, or has it > become a full standard? What is the date on the front page? > > The reason I ask is because there has been a case in the past where ECMA registered > one of their standards to get an ISO-IR-NNN number, but ISO itself made one or more > changes after that date, before it reached the final ISO standard stage. > > I believe the "csISOLatin15" should be "csISOLatin9" to be consistent with the > existing registrations for ISO-8859-9 and ISO-8859-10. You already have an alias > "latin9". This comes from the ISO spec itself, right? Does it say "Latin alphabet No. > 9"? > > Erik van der Poel --Boundary (ID uEbHHWxWEwCKT9wM3evJ5w)
Received on Wednesday, 25 March 1998 16:04:46 UTC