- From: unknown charset <alb@sct.gouv.qc.ca>
- Date: Tue, 24 Mar 1998 15:20:26 -0800
- To: erik@netscape.com, Marc Blanchet <Marc.Blanchet@viagenie.qc.ca>
- Cc: ietf-charsets@INNOSOFT.COM, ietf-charsets@iana.org
A 10:32 98-03-24 -0800, Erik van der Poel a écrit : [Erik] : >I believe the "csISOLatin15" should be "csISOLatin9" to be consistent with the >existing registrations for ISO-8859-9 and ISO-8859-10. You already have an alias >"latin9". This comes from the ISO spec itself, right? Does it say "Latin alphabet No. >9"? [Alain] : Just to make my previous answer clearer: "csISOLatin15" is certainly incorrect. It is part *15* of the ISO/IEC 8859 series. But it is Latin alphabet no. *9*. It is just incidental that part 1 of the series is Latin alphabet no. 1. There are also many non-Latin alphabets in this 8-bit CS series. Alain LaBonté Seattle --Boundary (ID uEbHHWxWEwCKT9wM3evJ5w)
Received on Wednesday, 25 March 1998 16:04:45 UTC