- From: Tommi <tommiweb1@q1b.com>
- Date: Thu, 15 Jul 2004 14:08:36 +0200
- To: Bjoern Hoehrmann <derhoermi@gmx.net>
- Cc: html-tidy@w3.org
I actually mean <title><asp:literal ... format like you described. The difference is that the above code is not off course sent to the end user (browser), because the <asp: tags are processed on server side. But, I'm now talking of integrating HTML Tidy with VS.NET during development, or integrating Tidy with other developement environments/languages that use proprietary/custom tags in code that are processed on the server side. This is why we would need to have some sort of wildcard matching new-script-tags option or similar. Bjoern Hoehrmann wrote, On 15.07.2004 13:12: > * Tommi wrote: >>About the other problem I was having: I have a page with <asp:> tag >>inside the head and title part of the page: >> >><title><asp:literal ... >> >>When I tidy this, it is moved into the body part and the head part is >>left with and empty <title></title>. Any idea why this happends? > > Well, the <title> element in HTML 4 and later only allows text, so that > > <title><asp:literal ... > > is certainly an error, you either mean > > <title><asp:literal ... > > or > > <title></title><asp:literal ... > > Tidy is designed to process (possibly illegal) HTML/XHTML/XML documents, > so it does not know much better than that...
Received on Thursday, 15 July 2004 08:08:31 UTC