- From: Charles Reitzel <creitzel@rcn.com>
- Date: Fri, 15 Nov 2002 14:43:30 -0500
- To: html-tidy@w3.org
FYI - Looks like there is demand for improved character set handling in Tidy. take it easy, Charlie >Delivered-To: cms-list@cms-list.org >From: Andrew Roberts <andrew.roberts@ephox.com> >Subject: RE: WYSIWYG on Mac >List-Id: content management discussion by and for web professionals ><cms-list.cms-list.org> >Date: Sat, 16 Nov 2002 05:06:54 +1000 > > >Ephox has integrated W3C's HTML Tidy into our Java-based editor. HTML Tidy >gives you the ability to specify output as XHTML 1.0, to convert <b> and ><i> to <strong> and <em>, and to convert all 'font' tags to 'span' tags. >You can find out more about Tidy at http://tidy.sourceforge.net/ but it >sounds like it meets your needs - and we expose these features through our >API (see >http://www.ephox.com/developers/editliveforjava/v2/jsp/webfolder/docs/config/xmldocs/htmlfilter.htm). > >One word of caution though, Tidy by itself doesn't handle a full range of >charactersets nicely, so in our new release we have >replaced their string handling with Java's internationalization classes >and achieved a massive range of characterset support as a result. For >completeness and credibility's sake, our competitors Ektron have also >integrated Tidy into their VB-based editor so you can expect to see >similar capabilities via their API as well (see >http://www.ektron.com/software/released/ewebeditpro/v30/drg/elemen22.htm). >RealObjects have announced they plan to integrate Tidy into their upcoming >release (see http://www.realobjects.de/english/artikel31_e.htm). > >Andrew Roberts, CTO >www.ephox.com > > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: cms-list-admin@cms-list.org > > [mailto:cms-list-admin@cms-list.org]On > > Behalf Of Pete Prodoehl > > Sent: Friday, November 15, 2002 9:20 AM > > To: cms-list@cms-list.org > > Subject: Re: WYSIWYG on Mac > > > > > > > > What level of control do any of the WYSIWYG in-page > > editors give you over the output? > > > > The one's I've seen all do things like insert <b> and <i>, > > where I would prefer <strong> and <em>. I would like to > > know if I can control things enough to output valid XHTML > > 1.0. I'd settle for Transitional even ;) > > > > And do any of them handle CSS properly? Could I define > > the styles so that a user making inline text red (ugh!) > > would create markup with a <span> tag rather than a > > <font> tag? > > > > > > Pete > >http://cms-list.org/ >trim your replies for good karma.
Received on Friday, 15 November 2002 14:41:57 UTC