- From: Klaus Johannes Rusch <KlausRusch@atmedia.net>
- Date: Mon, 25 Feb 2002 20:58:38 CET
- To: html-tidy@w3.org
In <200202040117.OAA290018@atlas.otago.ac.nz>, "Richard A. O'Keefe" <ok@atlas.otago.ac.nz> writes: Richard > - if any version of Tidy *does* change block-level tags <FOO> to > quasi-CDATA <FOO> inside <PRE> that's a really disastrous mistake > + if it changes all tags, that will break legal pages > + if it changes some tags but not others, that will NOT have the > "poor-man's CDATA section" effect that he says is wanted I am NOT saying that converting everything between <pre> and </pre> as if it was a CDATA section is desirable but it is the output I get from the current tidy build. I would in fact argue that the functionality is a bad idea, however rather than taking your wish for tidy to behave differently and possibly break another user's use of tidy, I would like to (1) understand why the implementation is as it is now and (2) what the best output for tidy would be. -- Klaus Johannes Rusch KlausRusch@atmedia.net http://www.atmedia.net/KlausRusch/
Received on Monday, 25 February 2002 15:31:15 UTC