RE: Possible bug in TidyCom.

Matthew Stanfield wrote:

> > Actually, I wasn't wanting that option in particular, but 
> > many of the other, newer options.  Thank you, though!

> Such as: "doctype: omit"

No, that was in the August 4, 2000 release too (and, I think, even
earlier ones).

> What other options do not work?

Compare the list of config-file and command-line options at

	http://www.w3.org/People/Raggett/tidy/

to

	http://tidy.sourceforge.net/quickref.html


/Jelks

Received on Saturday, 23 February 2002 16:40:01 UTC