- From: Manos Batsis <m.batsis@bsnet.gr>
- Date: Wed, 21 Nov 2001 11:48:02 +0200
- To: <html-tidy@w3.org>
> Message-ID: <3BF80343.9050108@aqiii.org> > Date: Sun, 18 Nov 2001 13:51:47 -0500 > From: Hans Deragon <deragon@aqiii.org> > To: Lee Passey <lee@dysfunctionals.org> > CC: html-tidy@w3.org > Subject: Ignoring tags in Jtidy (Developers/maintainers, > please comment) > > Bingo! You gave me a major clue. I have added a new tag type: > > new-ignored-tags > > and it works, at least in a body tag (I will generalize it later). > None of the current tag definition did what I wanted. > > So, developers (maintainers of Jtidy, tidy, etc..), what do > you think about > adding this feature in the main tree? Please provide me your > comments. My humble opinion is that Jtidy should just make unknown tags well formed, as long as they have a namespace prefix associated with a namespace declaration in a correct context within the document. Another subject I am up against at this time is dealing with (X)HTML fragments (see my fragments post). Kindest regards, Manos (not subscribed!)
Received on Wednesday, 21 November 2001 04:46:09 UTC