- From: Pete Gelbman <pete@gelbman.com>
- Date: Thu, 06 Jul 2000 19:29:01 +0800
- To: "Masterson, David" <David.Masterson@kla-tencor.com>
- cc: "'html-tidy@w3.org'" <html-tidy@w3.org>
>>>>> On Thu, 6 Jul 2000, Masterson, David wrote: David> HTML Tidy looks like an interesting program, but I think converting it David> to Autoconf/Automake standards would make it more easily maintainable David> by the legions of GNU developers. This would probably make it easier David> to build on all the many varied UNIX systems out there (and possibly David> Windows). Finally, it gives a lot of control to the installer in David> deciding where and how to install it. David> I've already taken a quick whack at that conversion and could send David> it to whoever would like to see it (its not that hard). There are a David> couple of questions I have, though, that would help in the conversion David> (note: I have not yet gotten to trying to use tidy): David> * What are the GIF files for (tidy.gif and grid.gif)? * In David> order to make the name more specific, would you mean if it was David> called "htmltidy" instead of "tidy"? * Have you thought of doing David> documentation in plain text and then converting to HTML? David> Anyone interested in this? I did it because it's in keeping with David> the installation of other tools we use here. -- David Masterson * David> KLA-Tencor Corp. * David.Masterson@kla-tencor.com Personally, I think it's a great idea, both as a heavy GNU\Linux supporter and as a big fan of Tidy. There may be differences between GNU and w3c licensing concepts that you ought to investigate... -- ~pete
Received on Friday, 7 July 2000 03:14:09 UTC