- From: Gerald Oskoboiny <gerald@w3.org>
- Date: Fri, 26 Nov 1999 05:03:28 -0500
- To: James Harnett <mharnett@uswest.net>
- Cc: html-tidy@w3.org
On Fri, Nov 26, 1999 at 02:35:19AM -0500, James Harnett wrote: > >[ Christopher R. Maden: ] > >> FreeBSD is not Linux and vice versa. See > >> <URL:http://www.freebsd.org/> for more info on FreeBSD. > [ Scott Kenney: ] > >And since I'm the tidy maintainer for FreeBSD, I'd be interested in > >where this information is from. > > Thank you Scott, > > Let's carry this a little further. > > Who's misconceived notion was it to stat such the false rumor, that FreeBSD > is not Linux? There is a problem in making such a statement. I can only > surmise that the writer is young, inexperienced, short on education, a > jokester, can not comprehend what they read, and / or works for microsoft. > That statement needs to be supported, assuming that it can, by the person > making the statement. I for one want verification of the validity. Until > then, I will assume that this person is one of the above and nothing more. Sorry, but you are mistaken. > I encourage the use of Linux and recognizes that other Unix-compatible > operating systems such as FreeBSD, NetBSD, Redhat, SuSE, Caldera, etc.. > all deserve attention and recognition. The only major significant > difference in these flavors of "Linux", is the extra set of tools, > utilities, 3rd party software, and packaging wrapper. The basic operating > system "kernel" is the same. It is Linux. FreeBSD and NetBSD are completely different Unixes, not distributions of Linux like Redhat, SuSE, Caldera, etc. There's also OpenBSD ( http://www.openbsd.org/ ) This (biased) article talks a bit about them and their differences: http://www.zdnet.com/filters/printerfriendly/0,6061,2299366-2,00.html -- Gerald Oskoboiny <gerald@w3.org> +1 617 253 2920 System Administrator http://www.w3.org/People/Gerald/ World Wide Web Consortium (W3C) http://www.w3.org/
Received on Friday, 26 November 1999 05:03:29 UTC