W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > xsl-editors@w3.org > January to March 2002

RE: xslt 2 working draft

From: Kay, Michael <Michael.Kay@softwareag.com>
Date: Thu, 3 Jan 2002 17:01:38 +0100
Message-ID: <DFF2AC9E3583D511A21F0008C7E6210622B8AA@softwareag.com>
To: "'DPawson@rnib.org.uk'" <DPawson@rnib.org.uk>
Cc: xsl-editors@w3.org


> -----Original Message-----
> From: DPawson@rnib.org.uk [mailto:DPawson@rnib.org.uk]
> Sent: 03 January 2002 08:22
> To: xsl-editors@w3.org
> Cc: xsl-editors@w3.org
> Subject: xslt 2 working draft
> 
> 
> 
> http://www.w3.org/TR/xslt20/#section-Summary-of-Issues
> Issue 1: binding-to-schema
> 
> Description: Do we need to say anything, or add any capabilities, for
> binding a stylesheet to a schema? Presumably the names of 
> types used in
> variable declarations must be known statically, which implies 
> that a schema
> is available statically.
> 
> >From http://www.w3.org/TR/xmlgl#g4_0
> 
> 
> 4.2 Provide a machine-understandable means/mechanism to get 
> from a document
> instance to the schema. 
> 
> I think an XSLT stylesheet stands as an XML document?
>
Yes, but that's not what this issue is talking about. Your reference is
talking about getting from an XML document to its own schema. This issue is
talking about whether a stylesheet should declare the class (or classes) of
source document that it is designed to process.

Mike Kay
Received on Thursday, 3 January 2002 11:04:31 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Monday, 7 December 2009 10:59:52 GMT