W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > xsl-editors@w3.org > January to March 2002

RE: xslt 2 working draft

From: <DPawson@rnib.org.uk>
Date: Thu, 3 Jan 2002 16:17:33 -0000
Message-ID: <9B66BBD37D5DD411B8CE00508B69700FE7A998@pborolocal.rnib.org.uk>
To: w3c-wai-pf@w3.org
Cc: xsl-editors@w3.org
Mike Kay wrote:

> > http://www.w3.org/TR/xslt20/#section-Summary-of-Issues
> > Issue 1: binding-to-schema
> > 
> > Description: Do we need to say anything, or add any 
> capabilities, for
> > binding a stylesheet to a schema? Presumably the names of 
> > types used in
> > variable declarations must be known statically, which implies 
> > that a schema
> > is available statically.
> > 
> > >From http://www.w3.org/TR/xmlgl#g4_0
> > 
> > 
> > 4.2 Provide a machine-understandable means/mechanism to get 
> > from a document
> > instance to the schema. 
> > 
> > I think an XSLT stylesheet stands as an XML document?
> >
> Yes, but that's not what this issue is talking about. Your 
> reference is
> talking about getting from an XML document to its own schema. 
> This issue is
> talking about whether a stylesheet should declare the class 
> (or classes) of
> source document that it is designed to process.

Surely the document class is encapsulated in the schema?

I can see the difference, and in fact the stylesheet 
may well totally change the instance elements.
the words in your issue seem to imply binding the stylesheet
to the schema, I presumed that meant to the schema of the source
document.

Regards DaveP


- 

NOTICE: The information contained in this email and any attachments is 
confidential and may be legally privileged. If you are not the 
intended recipient you are hereby notified that you must not use, 
disclose, distribute, copy, print or rely on this email's content. If 
you are not the intended recipient, please notify the sender 
immediately and then delete the email and any attachments from your 
system.

RNIB has made strenuous efforts to ensure that emails and any 
attachments generated by its staff are free from viruses. However, it 
cannot accept any responsibility for any viruses which are 
transmitted. We therefore recommend you scan all attachments.

Please note that the statements and views expressed in this email 
and any attachments are those of the author and do not necessarily 
represent those of RNIB.

RNIB Registered Charity Number: 226227

Website: http://www.rnib.org.uk 
Received on Thursday, 3 January 2002 11:15:37 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Monday, 7 December 2009 10:59:52 GMT