W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > xproc-dev@w3.org > November 2012

Re: Permanently sinking output ports

From: Alex Muir <alex.g.muir@gmail.com>
Date: Sat, 17 Nov 2012 13:00:23 -0500
Message-ID: <CAFtPEJYp4S6eX7cc7-TWSQba0-2JPDqgHhM0up1jnZ18uykAkA@mail.gmail.com>
To: Romain Deltour <rdeltour@gmail.com>
Cc: QuiXProc XProc <quixproc@gmail.com>, XProc Dev <xproc-dev@w3.org>
I'm wondering if "hint" is the right word here. If the p:sink attribute is
optional, the graph analysis program logic would be the same plus the
addition of logic to handle the option. Wouldn't it have to be a "required"
attribute to have some positive affect on graph analysis logic?

On Sat, Nov 17, 2012 at 11:48 AM, Romain Deltour <rdeltour@gmail.com> wrote:

> What I suggest is for the author to be able to give a hint to the
> implementation, so that it's easier to implement such optimization without
> requiring to perform a complete graph analysis.


Alex G. Muir
Software Engineering Consultant
Linkedin Profile : http://ca.linkedin.com/pub/alex-muir/36/ab7/125
Love African Kora Music? Take a moment to listen to Gambia's - Amadu
Diabarte & Jali Bakary Konteh www.bafila.bandcamp.com Your support keeps
Africa's griot tradition alive... Cheers!
Received on Saturday, 17 November 2012 18:00:51 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 21:03:10 UTC