W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > xproc-dev@w3.org > February 2009

RE: Expected results of http-request-005

From: <Toman_Vojtech@emc.com>
Date: Tue, 3 Feb 2009 02:47:41 -0500
Message-ID: <6E216CCE0679B5489A61125D0EFEC7870E5ED09A@CORPUSMX10A.corp.emc.com>
To: <xproc-dev@w3.org>

> Has anyone else attempted to pass the http-request-005 test?
>   http://tests.xproc.org/tests/required/http-request-005.xml

I have attempted. But in this case, to be able to actually compare the
results, I still need to do some work on p:http-request. (There is
always some work on p:http-request.)

> Having now rewritten the Calabash code that decodes multipart MIME
> messages, I'm confident that the expected results are incorrect. You
> can test this yourself by cutting out the base64 encoded lines of the
> second part and decoding them. The result is not a valid PNG file.

There was a similar problem with http-request-004, which I have fixed
some time ago. I think I should have done that for the other
http-request tests as well, but I think simply forgot about it...

> If no one disagrees, I'm going to correct the expected results of
> http-request-005.

I agree.

Received on Tuesday, 3 February 2009 07:48:25 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 21:03:04 UTC