W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > xproc-dev@w3.org > February 2009

Re: Expected results of http-request-005

From: Florent Georges <fgeorges@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 4 Feb 2009 16:39:23 +0100
Message-ID: <ebaca5bf0902040739l7360cc28mb5526293d39b8755@mail.gmail.com>
To: Norman Walsh <ndw@nwalsh.com>
Cc: XProc Dev <xproc-dev@w3.org>

2009/2/3 Norman Walsh wrote:

> Has anyone else attempted to pass the http-request-005 test?

>  http://tests.xproc.org/tests/required/http-request-005.xml

> Having now rewritten the Calabash code that decodes multipart MIME
> messages, I'm confident that the expected results are incorrect. You
> can test this yourself by cutting out the base64 encoded lines of the
> second part and decoding them. The result is not a valid PNG file.

  Did you already change it?  Because the base64 content in the link
above (as well as in the archive at
http://tests.xproc.org/tests/xproc-test-suite.zip) seems correct to


Florent Georges
Received on Wednesday, 4 February 2009 15:48:35 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 21:03:04 UTC