W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > xproc-dev@w3.org > April 2009

[closed] Re: parameters

From: Norman Walsh <ndw@nwalsh.com>
Date: Fri, 10 Apr 2009 11:05:32 -0400
To: XProc Dev <xproc-dev@w3.org>
Message-ID: <m2ljq81rcz.fsf@nwalsh.com>
"Dave Pawson" <dave.pawson@gmail.com> writes:
> Confused.

I think this is an improvement.

  Steps may have parameter input ports, on which parameters can be
  passed. A step can have zero, one, or many parameter input ports,
  and each parameter input port can have zero or more parameters
  passed on it. If more than one parameter with the same name is
  passed to any given parameter input port, only the last value
  specified will be available to the step; the names of the parameters
  passed to the step are unique on each port. Parameters with the same
  name can be passed to different ports, the uniqueness constraint on
  names only applies to the parameters passed on each individual port.

Please let me know if you don't find this satisfactory.

                                        Be seeing you,

Norman Walsh <ndw@nwalsh.com> | It is seldom that any liberty is lost
http://nwalsh.com/            | all at once.--David Hume

Received on Friday, 10 April 2009 15:06:16 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 21:03:04 UTC