W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > xproc-dev@w3.org > April 2009

Re: [closed] Re: parameters

From: Dave Pawson <dave.pawson@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 10 Apr 2009 17:15:45 +0100
Message-ID: <711a73df0904100915y8fdbfefs4dbcffe0503ef321@mail.gmail.com>
To: XProc Dev <xproc-dev@w3.org>
2009/4/10 Norman Walsh <ndw@nwalsh.com>:
> "Dave Pawson" <dave.pawson@gmail.com> writes:
>> Confused.
> I think this is an improvement.
>  Steps may have parameter input ports, on which parameters can be
>  passed. A step can have zero, one, or many parameter input ports,
>  and each parameter input port can have zero or more parameters
>  passed on it. If more than one parameter with the same name is
>  passed to any given parameter input port, only the last value
>  specified will be available to the step; the names of the parameters
>  passed to the step are unique on each port. Parameters with the same
>  name can be passed to different ports, the uniqueness constraint on
>  names only applies to the parameters passed on each individual port.
> Please let me know if you don't find this satisfactory.

Very crisp! Thanks Norm.
I'm happy.


Dave Pawson
Docbook FAQ.
Received on Friday, 10 April 2009 16:16:25 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 21:03:04 UTC