W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > xmlp-comments@w3.org > January 2003

Re: XMLP Issue 396 Closed

From: Marc Hadley <Marc.Hadley@Sun.COM>
Date: Wed, 22 Jan 2003 16:19:39 -0500
To: Henrik Frystyk Nielsen <henrikn@microsoft.com>
Cc: xmlp-comments@w3.org
Message-id: <373C5F2E-2E4F-11D7-BB28-0003937568DC@sun.com>

Hi Henrik,

The XMLP WG discussed your comments during todays telcon and agree with 
the clarifications you propose - they will be reflected in the 
specification. We hope this satisfies your concern, if not please 
respond to this message CCing xmlp-comments@w3.org.

Regards,
Marc (on behalf of the XMLP working group)

On Friday, Jan 17, 2003, at 16:20 US/Eastern, Henrik Frystyk Nielsen 
wrote:

>
> Marc,
>
> Adding a note is a good direction but I have a couple of concerns
> regarding the correctness of the suggested paragraph:
>
> 1) The term "uri" should be changed to "absolute URI reference" in the
> context of namespace names.
>
> 2) The XML NS 1.1 CR proposes to use IRIs rather than URIs even though 
> I
> think IRIs are still work in progress. However, if they go this route,
> it is in fact not an "equivalent" definition. As a result, I would
> suggest using the term "similar" instead of "equivalent".
>
> Thank you,
>
> Henrik Frystyk Nielsen
> mailto:henrikn@microsoft.com
>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: Marc Hadley [mailto:Marc.Hadley@Sun.COM]
>> Sent: Friday, January 17, 2003 12:50
>> To: Henrik Frystyk Nielsen
>> Cc: xmlp-comments@w3.org
>>
>> Henrik,
>>
>> You raised issue 396[1] against the CR of SOAP 1.2. The XMLP
>> WG discussed this issue ina recent telcon and decided on the
>> following course of action:
>>
>> (i) Add a note to section 1.3 of part 1 as follows:
>>
>> "This specification uses the term XML Expanded Name to refer
>> to the value space pair {uri,local-name} for a value of type xsd:Name.
>> Equivalent terminology is under consideration for inclusion in
>> future versions of [Namespaces in XML]. Should future versions
>> of [Namespaces in XML] adopt alternative terminology, we
>> anticipate that corresponding changes will be made to this
>> recommendation in the form of an erratum, or in conjunction
>> with some other future revision."
>>
>> (ii) Where appropriate, replace the term 'XML qualified name'
>> with 'XML expanded name' throughout part 1 and part 2.
>>
>> We hope this satisfies your concern, if not please let us know
>> by responding to this message making sure to CC xmlp-comments@w3.org.
>>
>> Regards,
>> Marc (on behalf of the W3C XML Protocol working group)
>>
>> [1] http://www.w3.org/2000/xp/Group/xmlp-cr-issues.html#x396
>
>
--
Marc Hadley <marc.hadley@sun.com>
Web Technologies and Standards, Sun Microsystems.
Received on Wednesday, 22 January 2003 16:19:13 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 27 October 2009 08:42:28 GMT