W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > xmlp-comments@w3.org > January 2003

RE: XMLP Issue 396 Closed

From: Henrik Frystyk Nielsen <henrikn@microsoft.com>
Date: Fri, 17 Jan 2003 13:20:40 -0800
Message-ID: <68B95AA1648D1840AB0083CC63E57AD6097C695E@red-msg-06.redmond.corp.microsoft.com>
To: "Marc Hadley" <Marc.Hadley@Sun.COM>
Cc: <xmlp-comments@w3.org>, <w3c-xml-protocol-wg@w3.org>


Adding a note is a good direction but I have a couple of concerns
regarding the correctness of the suggested paragraph:

1) The term "uri" should be changed to "absolute URI reference" in the
context of namespace names. 

2) The XML NS 1.1 CR proposes to use IRIs rather than URIs even though I
think IRIs are still work in progress. However, if they go this route,
it is in fact not an "equivalent" definition. As a result, I would
suggest using the term "similar" instead of "equivalent".

Thank you,

Henrik Frystyk Nielsen

>-----Original Message-----
>From: Marc Hadley [mailto:Marc.Hadley@Sun.COM] 
>Sent: Friday, January 17, 2003 12:50
>To: Henrik Frystyk Nielsen
>Cc: xmlp-comments@w3.org
>You raised issue 396[1] against the CR of SOAP 1.2. The XMLP 
>WG discussed this issue ina recent telcon and decided on the 
>following course of action:
>(i) Add a note to section 1.3 of part 1 as follows:
>"This specification uses the term XML Expanded Name to refer 
>to the value space pair {uri,local-name} for a value of type xsd:Name. 
>Equivalent terminology is under consideration for inclusion in 
>future versions of [Namespaces in XML]. Should future versions 
>of [Namespaces in XML] adopt alternative terminology, we 
>anticipate that corresponding changes will be made to this 
>recommendation in the form of an erratum, or in conjunction 
>with some other future revision."
>(ii) Where appropriate, replace the term 'XML qualified name' 
>with 'XML expanded name' throughout part 1 and part 2.
>We hope this satisfies your concern, if not please let us know 
>by responding to this message making sure to CC xmlp-comments@w3.org.
>Marc (on behalf of the W3C XML Protocol working group)
>[1] http://www.w3.org/2000/xp/Group/xmlp-cr-issues.html#x396
Received on Friday, 17 January 2003 16:21:13 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 20:16:59 UTC