- From: adam souzis <adam@kinecta.com>
- Date: Tue, 13 Aug 2002 13:31:32 -0700
- To: Martin Gudgin <mgudgin@microsoft.com>
- CC: xmlp-comments@w3.org
Sounds good to me. One nit: shouldn't it also allow "comment information items" as children? BTW, after I sent my comment I noticed the normative xml schema available at the env namespace URI does allow element children. regards, adam Martin Gudgin wrote: >Adam, > >You raised on issue on the SOAP 1.2 Last Call WD[1,2] which was recorded >as Issue 307[3] in the XMLP WG Last Call Issues List[4]. During a recent >face-to-face meeting the Working Group closed the issue with the >following resolution: > > We acknowledge that this is a bug. The spec will be changed to allow >header and body blocks to have element and character information items >as children. > >Thank you for bringing this error to the attention of the Working Group. > >I hope this resolution is satisfactory. If you are unsatisfied with the >resolution please let the XML Protocol WG know as soon as possible. > >Regards > >Martin Gudgin >For the XML Protocol Working Group > > >[1] http://www.w3.org/TR/2002/WD-soap12-part1-20020626/ >[2] http://www.w3.org/TR/2002/WD-soap12-part2-20020626/ >[3] http://www.w3.org/2000/xp/Group/xmlp-lc-issues.html#x307 >[4] http://www.w3.org/2000/xp/Group/xmlp-lc-issues.html > > > >
Received on Tuesday, 13 August 2002 16:32:20 UTC