RE: XMLP WG Issue 307 Resolution

Yes, there is basically a mismatch between the schema and the spec. I
have a TODO from the WG to figure out exactly which Information Items (
e.g. comments ) will be allowed. We will definitely allow elements and
characters. We may allow other stuff to. Watch this space.

Martin

> -----Original Message-----
> From: adam souzis [mailto:adam@kinecta.com] 
> Sent: 13 August 2002 21:32
> To: Martin Gudgin
> Cc: xmlp-comments@w3.org
> Subject: Re: XMLP WG Issue 307 Resolution
> 
> 
> Sounds good to me.  One nit: shouldn't it also allow "comment 
> information items" as children?  BTW, after I sent my comment 
> I noticed 
> the normative xml schema available at the env namespace URI 
> does allow 
> element children.
> 
> regards,
> adam
> 
> Martin Gudgin wrote:
> 
> >Adam,
> >
> >You raised on issue on the SOAP 1.2 Last Call WD[1,2] which was 
> >recorded as Issue 307[3] in the XMLP WG Last Call Issues List[4]. 
> >During a recent face-to-face meeting the Working Group 
> closed the issue 
> >with the following resolution:
> >
> > We acknowledge that this is a bug. The spec will be changed 
> to allow 
> >header and body blocks to have element and character 
> information items 
> >as children.
> >
> >Thank you for bringing this error to the attention of the Working 
> >Group.
> >
> >I hope this resolution is satisfactory. If you are 
> unsatisfied with the 
> >resolution please let the XML Protocol WG know as soon as possible.
> >
> >Regards
> >
> >Martin Gudgin
> >For the XML Protocol Working Group
> >
> >
> >[1] http://www.w3.org/TR/2002/WD-soap12-part1-20020626/
> >[2] http://www.w3.org/TR/2002/WD-soap12-part2-20020626/
> >[3] http://www.w3.org/2000/xp/Group/xmlp-lc-issues.html#x307
> >[4] http://www.w3.org/2000/xp/Group/xmlp-lc-issues.html
> >
> >
> >  
> >
> 
> 
> 
>

Received on Tuesday, 13 August 2002 16:38:31 UTC