- From: David Carlisle <david@dcarlisle.demon.co.uk>
- Date: Tue, 13 Jun 2000 20:41:53 +0100 (BST)
- To: connolly@w3.org
- CC: xml-uri@w3.org
(c) noone has disputed that the the two bats are distinct in http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/xml-uri/2000May/0137.html No one? There is nothing special about that test case, it is just an example using a relative URU. So presumably anyone who ever argued for the literal interpretation (which isn't just me, no matter how much you wished it were) must have argued that both uses were in the same "bat" namepsace (and so the document authors should probably have used better namespace names, such as absolute URI) David
Received on Tuesday, 13 June 2000 16:28:17 UTC