xml-uri@w3.org from June 2000: by thread

Why I moved from Forbid to Literal Simon St.Laurent (Friday, 30 June)
- Re: Why I moved from Forbid to Literal Henrik Frystyk Nielsen (Friday, 30 June)
  - Re: Why I moved from Forbid to Literal David Carlisle (Friday, 30 June)
    - Re: Why I moved from Forbid to Literal Henrik Frystyk Nielsen (Friday, 30 June)
  - Re: Why I moved from Forbid to Literal Jonathan Borden (Friday, 30 June)
- Re: Why I moved from Forbid to Literal Paul Grosso (Friday, 30 June)
  - Local Context [was: Why I moved from Forbid to Literal] W. E. Perry (Friday, 30 June)
    - Re: Local Context [was: Why I moved from Forbid to Literal] Jonathan Borden (Friday, 30 June)
    - Re: Local Context [was: Why I moved from Forbid to Literal] W. E. Perry (Friday, 30 June)
Database example was: The Kesselman/Connoly proposal Tim Berners-Lee (Friday, 30 June)
- Re: Database example was: The Kesselman/Connoly proposal keshlam@us.ibm.com (Friday, 30 June)
- Re: Database example was: The Kesselman/Connoly proposal james anderson (Friday, 30 June)
- Re: Database example was: The Kesselman/Connoly proposal keshlam@us.ibm.com (Friday, 30 June)
- Re: Database example was: The Kesselman/Connoly proposal David Carlisle (Friday, 30 June)
Re: The Kesselman/Connoly proposal (was Re: Re Deprecate /Undefined ) keshlam@us.ibm.com (Monday, 26 June)
- Re: The Kesselman/Connoly proposal (was Re: Re Deprecate/Undefined ) Michael Champion (Tuesday, 27 June)
Background material, belated keshlam@us.ibm.com (Monday, 26 June)
I have a dream Tim Bray (Sunday, 25 June)
relative URIs and local lexical scopes: "Unique Base"? Larry Masinter (Saturday, 24 June)
- Re: relative URIs and local lexical scopes: "Unique Base"? John Cowan (Sunday, 25 June)
Re: Re Deprecate/Undefined (was Request for status dump and issues check) Noah_Mendelsohn@lotus.com (Saturday, 24 June)
Another endorsement of Dan Connolly's recent proposal David G. Durand (Friday, 23 June)
Re: Re Deprecate/Undefined (was Request for status dump andissues check) John Cowan (Friday, 23 June)
Re: Re Deprecate/Undefined (was Request for status dump and issues check) Paul Grosso (Friday, 23 June)
- Re: Re Deprecate/Undefined (was Request for status dump and issues check) John Cowan (Friday, 23 June)
- Namespaces and infosets. David G. Durand (Friday, 23 June)
Thank you Dan David G. Durand (Thursday, 22 June)
namespace usage as assertions Manola,Frank A. (Wednesday, 21 June)
- RE: namespace usage as assertions Miles Sabin (Wednesday, 21 June)
- Re: namespace usage as assertions Dan Connolly (Wednesday, 21 June)
  - Infererence by scheme (Re: namespace usage as assertions) Simon St.Laurent (Wednesday, 21 June)
    - Re: Infererence by scheme (Re: namespace usage as assertions) Dan Connolly (Wednesday, 21 June)
    - Re: Infererence by scheme (Re: namespace usage as assertions) David Carlisle (Wednesday, 21 June)
    - Tar and feathers for me Simon St.Laurent (Wednesday, 21 June)
    - Re: Infererence by scheme (Re: namespace usage as assertions) Simon St.Laurent (Thursday, 22 June)
  - Re: namespace usage as assertions Eve L. Maler (Wednesday, 21 June)
    - Re: namespace usage as assertions Dan Connolly (Wednesday, 21 June)
    - Re: namespace usage as assertions Eve L. Maler (Wednesday, 21 June)
    - Re: namespace usage as assertions John Cowan (Wednesday, 21 June)
    - Re: namespace usage as assertions John Cowan (Wednesday, 21 June)
    - Re: namespace usage as assertions Eve L. Maler (Wednesday, 21 June)
  - Re: namespace usage as assertions Rick JELLIFFE (Wednesday, 21 June)
    - Re: namespace usage as assertions John Cowan (Wednesday, 21 June)
    - RE: namespace usage as assertions Larry Masinter (Thursday, 22 June)
    - Re: namespace usage as assertions james anderson (Friday, 23 June)
    - Re: namespace usage as assertions Rick JELLIFFE (Thursday, 29 June)
    - Re: namespace usage as assertions Dan Connolly (Wednesday, 21 June)
  - Re: namespace usage as assertions David Carlisle (Wednesday, 21 June)
  - Does every URI identify a resource? (Was:Re: namespace usage as assertions) Paul W. Abrahams (Wednesday, 21 June)
  - Re: namespace usage as assertions David G. Durand (Thursday, 22 June)
- Re: namespace usage as assertions Tim Bray (Wednesday, 21 June)
- Re: namespace usage as assertions Tim Berners-Lee (Wednesday, 21 June)
- RE: namespace usage as assertions keshlam@us.ibm.com (Friday, 23 June)
  - RE: namespace usage as assertions David G. Durand (Friday, 23 June)
- RE: namespace usage as assertions Miles Sabin (Friday, 23 June)
- RE: namespace usage as assertions keshlam@us.ibm.com (Friday, 23 June)
- Re: namespace usage as assertions keshlam@us.ibm.com (Thursday, 29 June)
  - Re: namespace usage as assertions John Cowan (Thursday, 29 June)
    - Re: namespace usage as assertions Paul W. Abrahams (Thursday, 29 June)
- Re: namespace usage as assertions keshlam@us.ibm.com (Thursday, 29 June)
- Re: namespace usage as assertions Paul Grosso (Thursday, 29 June)
The tail shouldn't wag the dog Paul W. Abrahams (Wednesday, 21 June)
- RE: The tail shouldn't wag the dog Stefan Eissing (Wednesday, 21 June)
Fixed base James Clark (Tuesday, 20 June)
- Re: Fixed base Daniel Veillard (Tuesday, 20 June)
- Re: Fixed base David G. Durand (Tuesday, 20 June)
  - Re: Fixed base John Cowan (Tuesday, 20 June)
    - Re: Fixed base David G. Durand (Tuesday, 20 June)
    - Re: Fixed base John Cowan (Tuesday, 20 June)
  - Re: Fixed base David Carlisle (Tuesday, 20 June)
- Re: Fixed base Dan Connolly (Tuesday, 20 June)
  - Re: Fixed base David Carlisle (Tuesday, 20 June)
  - Re: Fixed base James Clark (Wednesday, 21 June)
    - Re: Fixed base Liam Quin (Thursday, 22 June)
- Re: Fixed base John Cowan (Tuesday, 20 June)
  - Re: Fixed base James Clark (Wednesday, 21 June)
- Re: Fixed base keshlam@us.ibm.com (Thursday, 22 June)
  - Re: Fixed base Liam Quin (Thursday, 22 June)
    - RE: Fixed base Julian Reschke (Thursday, 22 June)
- Re: Fixed base keshlam@us.ibm.com (Thursday, 22 June)
Re: Language = Namespace. was: How namespace names might be used Tim Bray (Monday, 19 June)
- Re: Language = Namespace. was: How namespace names might be used Tim Berners-Lee (Wednesday, 21 June)
  - Re: Language = Namespace. was: How namespace names might be used John Cowan (Wednesday, 21 June)
  - Re: Language = Namespace. was: How namespace names might be used David G. Durand (Thursday, 22 June)
Worth repeating Tim Bray (Monday, 19 June)
Rehash of literal-vs-relative argument status Tim Berners-Lee (Monday, 19 June)
- Re: Rehash of literal-vs-relative argument status David G. Durand (Tuesday, 20 June)
  - Re: Rehash of literal-vs-relative argument status John Cowan (Tuesday, 20 June)
    - Re: Rehash of literal-vs-relative argument status David G. Durand (Tuesday, 20 June)
Choose your namespace (Was : Personal view) Henrik Frystyk Nielsen (Monday, 19 June)
- Re: Choose your namespace (Was : Personal view) David Carlisle (Monday, 19 June)
  - Re: Choose your namespace (Was : Personal view) Henrik Frystyk Nielsen (Monday, 19 June)
    - Re: Choose your namespace (Was : Personal view) David Carlisle (Monday, 19 June)
    - Re: Choose your namespace (Was : Personal view) Henrik Frystyk Nielsen (Tuesday, 20 June)
- Re: Choose your namespace (Was : Personal view) David G. Durand (Monday, 19 June)
  - Re: Choose your namespace (Was : Personal view) Henrik Frystyk Nielsen (Tuesday, 20 June)
    - Re: Choose your namespace (Was : Personal view) David G. Durand (Tuesday, 20 June)
    - Decentralization (was Re: Choose your namespace (Was : Personal view)) Simon St.Laurent (Wednesday, 21 June)
- Re: Choose your namespace (Was : Personal view) Paul W. Abrahams (Monday, 19 June)
  - Re: Choose your namespace (Was : Personal view) Henrik Frystyk Nielsen (Tuesday, 20 June)
    - Re: Choose your namespace (Was : Personal view) Paul W. Abrahams (Tuesday, 20 June)
    - Re: Choose your namespace (Was : Personal view) Henrik Frystyk Nielsen (Tuesday, 20 June)
  - Re: Choose your namespace (Was : Personal view) Graham Klyne (Tuesday, 20 June)
    - Re: Choose your namespace (Was : Personal view) Paul W. Abrahams (Tuesday, 20 June)
    - Re: Choose your namespace (Was : Personal view) Henrik Frystyk Nielsen (Tuesday, 20 June)
    - Re: Choose your namespace (Was : Personal view) John Aldridge (Tuesday, 20 June)
- Re: Choose your namespace (Was : Personal view) Daniel Veillard (Tuesday, 20 June)
  - Re: Choose your namespace (Was : Personal view) Liam Quin (Tuesday, 20 June)
- RE: Choose your namespace (Was : Personal view) Andrew Layman (Tuesday, 20 June)
  - RE: Choose your namespace (Was : Personal view) David G. Durand (Tuesday, 20 June)
    - Re: Choose your namespace (Was : Personal view) John Cowan (Tuesday, 20 June)
  - Re: Choose your namespace (Was : Personal view) David Carlisle (Tuesday, 20 June)
- RE: Choose your namespace (Was : Personal view) Andrew Layman (Tuesday, 20 June)
Language = Namespace. was: How namespace names might be used Tim Berners-Lee (Monday, 19 June)
- RE: Language = Namespace. was: How namespace names might be used Julian Reschke (Monday, 19 June)
  - RE: Language = Namespace. was: How namespace names might be used Eric Bohlman (Monday, 19 June)
- Re: Language = Namespace. was: How namespace names might be used Paul W. Abrahams (Monday, 19 June)
  - RE: Language = Namespace. was: How namespace names might be used Julian Reschke (Monday, 19 June)
    - Re: Language = Namespace. was: How namespace names might be used Paul W. Abrahams (Monday, 19 June)
    - Re: Language = Namespace. was: How namespace names might be used Dan Connolly (Tuesday, 20 June)
    - RE: Language = Namespace. was: How namespace names might be used Julian Reschke (Tuesday, 20 June)
    - Re: Language = Namespace. was: How namespace names might be used Dan Connolly (Tuesday, 20 June)
    - Re: Language = Namespace. was: How namespace names might be used Paul W. Abrahams (Tuesday, 20 June)
    - Re: Language = Namespace. was: How namespace names might be used Henrik Frystyk Nielsen (Tuesday, 20 June)
    - Re: Language = Namespace. was: How namespace names might be used Dan Connolly (Tuesday, 20 June)
    - Re: Language = Namespace. was: How namespace names might be used Simon St.Laurent (Tuesday, 20 June)
- Re: Language = Namespace. was: How namespace names might be used David G. Durand (Monday, 19 June)
- Re: Language = Namespace. was: How namespace names might be used David Carlisle (Monday, 19 June)
- Re: Language = Namespace. was: How namespace names might be used Tim Berners-Lee (Monday, 19 June)
- Re: Language = Namespace. was: How namespace names might be used John Aldridge (Tuesday, 20 June)
  - Re: Language = Namespace. was: How namespace names might be used Graham Klyne (Tuesday, 20 June)
    - Re: Language = Namespace. was: How namespace names might be used John Aldridge (Wednesday, 21 June)
    - Re: Language = Namespace. was: How namespace names might be used Graham Klyne (Wednesday, 21 June)
    - Re: Language = Namespace. was: How namespace names might be used David Carlisle (Wednesday, 21 June)
    - Re: Language = Namespace. was: How namespace names might be used Paul Grosso (Wednesday, 21 June)
    - We need some function f David Carlisle (Wednesday, 21 June)
    - Can everyone be happy? Paul W. Abrahams (Wednesday, 21 June)
    - Re: Can everyone be happy? David Carlisle (Thursday, 22 June)
    - Re: Can everyone be happy? Jonathan Borden (Thursday, 22 June)
    - Re: Can everyone be happy? Paul W. Abrahams (Thursday, 22 June)
    - Re: Can everyone be happy? Tim Berners-Lee (Thursday, 22 June)
    - Re: Can everyone be happy? W. E. Perry (Thursday, 22 June)
    - what about XPath? was: Can everyone be happy? Julian Reschke (Thursday, 22 June)
    - Re: what about XPath? was: Can everyone be happy? keshlam@us.ibm.com (Thursday, 22 June)
    - Re: what about XPath? was: Can everyone be happy? Al Gilman (Thursday, 22 June)
    - Re: Can everyone be happy? Simon St.Laurent (Thursday, 22 June)
    - Collect Proposed wordings (Was: Can everyone be happy?) Henrik Frystyk Nielsen (Thursday, 22 June)
    - Re: Collect Proposed wordings (Was: Can everyone be happy?) Simon St.Laurent (Thursday, 22 June)
    - Re: Collect Proposed wordings (Was: Can everyone be happy?) Paul W. Abrahams (Thursday, 22 June)
    - Re: Collect Proposed wordings (Was: Can everyone be happy?) Simon St.Laurent (Friday, 23 June)
    - Re: Collect Proposed wordings (Was: Can everyone be happy?) Paul W. Abrahams (Friday, 23 June)
    - Re: Collect Proposed wordings (Was: Can everyone be happy?) John Cowan (Friday, 23 June)
    - Re: Collect Proposed wordings (Was: Can everyone be happy?) Paul W. Abrahams (Friday, 23 June)
    - Re: Collect Proposed wordings (Was: Can everyone be happy?) John Cowan (Friday, 23 June)
    - Re: Collect Proposed wordings (Was: Can everyone be happy?) David G. Durand (Thursday, 22 June)
    - Re: Collect Proposed wordings (Was: Can everyone be happy?) Henrik Frystyk Nielsen (Thursday, 22 June)
    - Re: Collect Proposed wordings (Was: Can everyone be happy?) David G. Durand (Friday, 23 June)
    - Re: Collect Proposed wordings (Was: Can everyone be happy?) David Carlisle (Friday, 23 June)
    - Re: Collect Proposed wordings (Was: Can everyone be happy?) Tim Bray (Sunday, 25 June)
    - Re: Collect Proposed wordings (Was: Can everyone be happy?) keshlam@us.ibm.com (Thursday, 22 June)
    - Re: Collect Proposed wordings (Was: Can everyone be happy?) Henrik Frystyk Nielsen (Friday, 23 June)
    - Re: Collect Proposed wordings (Was: Can everyone be happy?) David Carlisle (Saturday, 24 June)
    - Re: Can everyone be happy? Dan Connolly (Thursday, 22 June)
    - Re: Can everyone be happy? David Carlisle (Friday, 23 June)
    - Re: Can everyone be happy? John Cowan (Thursday, 22 June)
    - Re: Can everyone be happy? David G. Durand (Thursday, 22 June)
    - Re: Can everyone be happy? keshlam@us.ibm.com (Thursday, 22 June)
    - Re: Can everyone be happy? keshlam@us.ibm.com (Thursday, 22 June)
    - Re: Can everyone be happy? Henrik Frystyk Nielsen (Thursday, 22 June)
    - Re: Can everyone be happy? John Cowan (Thursday, 22 June)
    - vocabularies was: Re: Can everyone be happy? Jonathan Borden (Thursday, 22 June)
    - Re: vocabularies was: Re: Can everyone be happy? Simon St.Laurent (Thursday, 22 June)
    - Re: vocabularies was: Re: Can everyone be happy? John Cowan (Thursday, 22 June)
    - Re: vocabularies was: Re: Can everyone be happy? Simon St.Laurent (Friday, 23 June)
    - Re: vocabularies was: Re: Can everyone be happy? Eric Bohlman (Thursday, 22 June)
    - Re: vocabularies was: Re: Can everyone be happy? Simon St.Laurent (Friday, 23 June)
    - Re: Can everyone be happy? Paul W. Abrahams (Thursday, 22 June)
    - Re: Can everyone be happy? Sam Hunting (Thursday, 22 June)
    - Re: Can everyone be happy? keshlam@us.ibm.com (Thursday, 22 June)
    - Re: Can everyone be happy? Henrik Frystyk Nielsen (Thursday, 22 June)
    - Re: Can everyone be happy? keshlam@us.ibm.com (Friday, 23 June)
    - Re: Can everyone be happy? keshlam@us.ibm.com (Friday, 23 June)
    - Re: Can everyone be happy? Henrik Frystyk Nielsen (Friday, 23 June)
    - Re: Can everyone be happy? Tim Berners-Lee (Friday, 23 June)
    - Re: Can everyone be happy? Tim Berners-Lee (Saturday, 24 June)
    - Re: We need some function f Paul Grosso (Thursday, 22 June)
- Re: Language = Namespace. was: How namespace names might be used Tim Berners-Lee (Wednesday, 21 June)
  - Re: Language = Namespace. was: How namespace names might be used David G. Durand (Thursday, 22 June)
- Re: Language = Namespace. was: How namespace names might be used Tim Berners-Lee (Wednesday, 21 June)
- Re: Language = Namespace. was: How namespace names might be used Tim Berners-Lee (Wednesday, 21 June)
  - Re: Language = Namespace. was: How namespace names might be used David Carlisle (Wednesday, 21 June)
  - Re: Language = Namespace. was: How namespace names might be used Simon St.Laurent (Thursday, 22 June)
- Re: Language = Namespace. was: How namespace names might be used Tim Berners-Lee (Wednesday, 21 June)
Personal view Daniel Veillard (Saturday, 17 June)
- Re: Personal view Simon St.Laurent (Saturday, 17 June)
  - Re: Personal view Daniel Veillard (Sunday, 18 June)
- Re: Personal view Tim Bray (Saturday, 17 June)
- Re: Personal view David Carlisle (Saturday, 17 June)
  - Differentiating literal and forbid (Re: Personal view) Simon St.Laurent (Saturday, 17 June)
- RE: Personal view Larry Masinter (Sunday, 18 June)
  - Re: Personal view David Carlisle (Sunday, 18 June)
    - Re: Personal view Daniel Veillard (Sunday, 18 June)
    - RE: Personal view Larry Masinter (Sunday, 18 June)
    - Re: Personal view David Carlisle (Sunday, 18 June)
Fwd: Re: How namespace names might be used John Aldridge (Friday, 16 June)
(no subject) keshlam@us.ibm.com (Thursday, 15 June)
Personal view John Aldridge (Thursday, 15 June)
Layering XPath/XSLT namespaces is unacceptable Michael Champion (Wednesday, 14 June)
- Re: Layering XPath/XSLT namespaces is unacceptable Al Gilman (Wednesday, 14 June)
  - Re: Layering XPath/XSLT namespaces is unacceptable Michael Champion (Wednesday, 14 June)
    - Re: Layering XPath/XSLT namespaces is unacceptable Al Gilman (Wednesday, 14 June)
    - Re: Layering XPath/XSLT namespaces is unacceptable David G. Durand (Wednesday, 14 June)
    - Re: Layering XPath/XSLT namespaces is unacceptable Michael Champion (Wednesday, 14 June)
    - Re: Layering XPath/XSLT namespaces is unacceptable Al Gilman (Thursday, 15 June)
- Re: Layering XPath/XSLT namespaces is unacceptable Tim Berners-Lee (Wednesday, 14 June)
  - In praise of fixed base was: Layering XPath/XSLT namespaces is unacceptable David Carlisle (Wednesday, 14 June)
- Re: Layering XPath/XSLT namespaces is unacceptable James Clark (Thursday, 15 June)
- Re: Layering XPath/XSLT namespaces is unacceptable keshlam@us.ibm.com (Thursday, 15 June)
  - Re: Layering XPath/XSLT namespaces is unacceptable Al Gilman (Thursday, 15 June)
- Re: Layering XPath/XSLT namespaces is unacceptable keshlam@us.ibm.com (Thursday, 15 June)
  - Re: Layering XPath/XSLT namespaces is unacceptable Michael Champion (Thursday, 15 June)
    - Re: Layering XPath/XSLT namespaces is unacceptable Clark C. Evans (Thursday, 15 June)
Context and... Re: the case of two bats Jonathan Borden (Wednesday, 14 June)
- Re: Context and... Re: the case of two bats Tim Berners-Lee (Wednesday, 14 June)
  - Re: Context and... Re: the case of two bats Jonathan Borden (Wednesday, 14 June)
    - jettisoning baggage Simon St.Laurent (Thursday, 15 June)
    - Re: jettisoning baggage Paul W. Abrahams (Thursday, 15 June)
    - Re: jettisoning baggage Al Gilman (Thursday, 15 June)
    - Re: jettisoning baggage Simon St.Laurent (Thursday, 15 June)
  - Documents, Anchors, Nodes and Context was: RE: Context and... Re: the case of two bats Jonathan Borden (Thursday, 15 June)
- Re: Context and... Re: the case of two bats Paul W. Abrahams (Wednesday, 14 June)
  - Re: Context and... Re: the case of two bats David Carlisle (Wednesday, 14 June)
    - Re: Context and... Re: the case of two bats Paul W. Abrahams (Thursday, 15 June)
    - Re: Context and... Re: the case of two bats Al Gilman (Thursday, 15 June)
    - Re: Context and... Re: the case of two bats Paul W. Abrahams (Thursday, 15 June)
- Re: Context and... Re: the case of two bats keshlam@us.ibm.com (Thursday, 15 June)
- Re: Context and... Re: the case of two bats Tim Berners-Lee (Thursday, 15 June)
  - Re: Context and... Re: the case of two bats Simon St.Laurent (Thursday, 15 June)
some uses of relative URI as namespace names David Carlisle (Tuesday, 13 June)
- Re: some uses of relative URI as namespace names keshlam@us.ibm.com (Thursday, 15 June)
essential test cases? Dan Connolly (Tuesday, 13 June)
- RE: essential test cases? Julian Reschke (Tuesday, 13 June)
- Re: essential test cases? Simon St.Laurent (Tuesday, 13 June)
- Re: essential test cases? David Carlisle (Tuesday, 13 June)
  - Re: essential test cases? Dan Connolly (Wednesday, 14 June)
    - Re: essential test cases? Simon St.Laurent (Wednesday, 14 June)
    - RE: essential test cases? Julian Reschke (Wednesday, 14 June)
- Re: essential test cases? keshlam@us.ibm.com (Wednesday, 14 June)
  - Re: essential test cases? James Clark (Thursday, 15 June)
    - Re: essential test cases? Ray Whitmer (Thursday, 15 June)
    - RE: essential test cases? Don Park (Saturday, 17 June)
- Re: essential test cases? keshlam@us.ibm.com (Wednesday, 14 June)
- RE: essential test cases? Al Gilman (Wednesday, 14 June)
  - RE: essential test cases? Julian Reschke (Wednesday, 14 June)
- RE: essential test cases? keshlam@us.ibm.com (Wednesday, 14 June)
  - Re: essential test cases? Paul W. Abrahams (Wednesday, 14 June)
- Re: essential test cases? James Clark (Thursday, 15 June)
  - Re: essential test cases? Paul W. Abrahams (Thursday, 15 June)
- Re: essential test cases? keshlam@us.ibm.com (Thursday, 15 June)
  - Re: essential test cases? Simon St.Laurent (Thursday, 15 June)
- Re: essential test cases? keshlam@us.ibm.com (Thursday, 15 June)
Re: PUBLIC/SYSTEM distinction (was Re: typo/bug in the namespace spec) keshlam@us.ibm.com (Tuesday, 13 June)
1343 messages later Simon St.Laurent (Monday, 12 June)
- Re: 1343 messages later Tim Berners-Lee (Tuesday, 13 June)
  - Re: 1343 messages later Simon St.Laurent (Tuesday, 13 June)
    - Re: 1343 messages later Simon St.Laurent (Tuesday, 13 June)
    - Re: 1343 messages later John Cowan (Wednesday, 14 June)
    - Re: 1343 messages later Al Gilman (Wednesday, 14 June)
    - Re: 1343 messages later David Carlisle (Wednesday, 14 June)
    - Re: 1343 messages later James Clark (Thursday, 15 June)
    - Re: 1343 messages later John Cowan (Thursday, 15 June)
    - Re: 1343 messages later Paul W. Abrahams (Thursday, 15 June)
    - Re: 1343 messages later Al Gilman (Thursday, 15 June)
    - Re: 1343 messages later Graham Klyne (Wednesday, 14 June)
    - Re: 1343 messages later Paul W. Abrahams (Wednesday, 14 June)
    - Re: 1343 messages later Henrik Frystyk Nielsen (Sunday, 18 June)
  - Re: 1343 messages later Jonathan Borden (Wednesday, 14 June)
- Re: 1343 messages later keshlam@us.ibm.com (Wednesday, 14 June)
- Re: 1343 messages later Al Gilman (Wednesday, 14 June)
- Re: 1343 messages later Tim Berners-Lee (Wednesday, 14 June)
  - Re: 1343 messages later John Cowan (Wednesday, 14 June)
  - Re: 1343 messages later Dan Brickley (Wednesday, 14 June)
- Re: 1343 messages later keshlam@us.ibm.com (Thursday, 15 June)
  - Re: 1343 messages later Daniel Veillard (Thursday, 15 June)
- Re: 1343 messages later keshlam@us.ibm.com (Thursday, 15 June)
- Re: 1343 messages later Tim Berners-Lee (Monday, 19 June)
Annotation protocols [was: How namespace names might be used] Tim Berners-Lee (Monday, 12 June)
- Re: Annotation protocols [was: How namespace names might be used] Simon St.Laurent (Monday, 12 June)
- Re: Annotation protocols [was: How namespace names might be used] Tim Berners-Lee (Monday, 12 June)
- Re: Annotation protocols [was: How namespace names might be used] Tim Bray (Tuesday, 13 June)
How are semantics named? Tim Bray (Monday, 12 June)
- Re: How are semantics named? Simon St.Laurent (Monday, 12 June)
- Re: How are semantics named? keshlam@us.ibm.com (Monday, 12 June)
  - Spinning off interesting heresies (was Re: How are semantics named?) Simon St.Laurent (Monday, 12 June)
(no subject) keshlam@us.ibm.com (Monday, 12 June)
(no subject) keshlam@us.ibm.com (Monday, 12 June)
- Re: Michael Mealling (Monday, 12 June)
How namespace names might be used Tim Bray (Saturday, 10 June)
- Re: How namespace names might be used Henrik Frystyk Nielsen (Saturday, 10 June)
  - Re: How namespace names might be used John Cowan (Sunday, 11 June)
- Re: How namespace names might be used Eric Bohlman (Sunday, 11 June)
- Re: How namespace names might be used Michael Mealling (Sunday, 11 June)
  - Re: How namespace names might be used Eric Bohlman (Sunday, 11 June)
  - Re: How namespace names might be used Tim Bray (Sunday, 11 June)
  - RE: How namespace names might be used Jelks Cabaniss (Monday, 12 June)
    - Re: How namespace names might be used Dan Connolly (Tuesday, 13 June)
    - Implied best practices (was Re: How namespace names might be used) Simon St.Laurent (Tuesday, 13 June)
    - Re: How namespace names might be used W. E. Perry (Tuesday, 13 June)
    - Re: How namespace names might be used Al Gilman (Tuesday, 13 June)
    - Re: How namespace names might be used Simon St.Laurent (Tuesday, 13 June)
    - Re: How namespace names might be used Al Gilman (Tuesday, 13 June)
    - Re: How namespace names might be used W. E. Perry (Tuesday, 13 June)
    - Re: How namespace names might be used Al Gilman (Tuesday, 13 June)
    - Re: How namespace names might be used David Carlisle (Tuesday, 13 June)
    - Re: How namespace names might be used Dan Connolly (Tuesday, 13 June)
    - Re: How namespace names might be used David Carlisle (Wednesday, 14 June)
    - Re: How namespace names might be used John Aldridge (Friday, 16 June)
    - Re: How namespace names might be used Al Gilman (Friday, 16 June)
    - Re: How namespace names might be used Simon St.Laurent (Friday, 16 June)
    - Private address spaces and URIs Simon St.Laurent (Friday, 16 June)
    - Re: How namespace names might be used Al Gilman (Saturday, 17 June)
    - Re: How namespace names might be used Simon St.Laurent (Saturday, 17 June)
    - Re: How namespace names might be used Paul W. Abrahams (Friday, 16 June)
    - Re: How namespace names might be used Al Gilman (Saturday, 17 June)
    - Re: How namespace names might be used Paul W. Abrahams (Saturday, 17 June)
    - Re: How namespace names might be used John Cowan (Monday, 19 June)
    - Re: How namespace names might be used Paul W. Abrahams (Monday, 19 June)
- Re: How namespace names might be used David Carlisle (Sunday, 11 June)
  - Re: How namespace names might be used Michael Mealling (Sunday, 11 June)
  - Re: How namespace names might be used Clark C. Evans (Sunday, 11 June)
- Re: How namespace names might be used Simon St.Laurent (Sunday, 11 June)
- RE: How namespace names might be used keshlam@us.ibm.com (Monday, 12 June)
  - RE: How namespace names might be used Simon St.Laurent (Monday, 12 June)
- Re: How namespace names might be used Graham Klyne (Tuesday, 13 June)
More nervousness about NS Names bearing semantics Tim Bray (Saturday, 10 June)
Re: typo/bug in the namespace spec Tim Bray (Saturday, 10 June)
- Re: typo/bug in the namespace spec David Carlisle (Saturday, 10 June)
- Re: typo/bug in the namespace spec Henrik Frystyk Nielsen (Saturday, 10 June)
- Closure (was Re: typo/bug in the namespace spec) Michael Champion (Sunday, 11 June)
- Re: typo/bug in the namespace spec Simon St.Laurent (Sunday, 11 June)
  - Re: typo/bug in the namespace spec Michael Mealling (Sunday, 11 June)
    - PUBLIC/SYSTEM distinction (was Re: typo/bug in the namespace spec) Simon St.Laurent (Sunday, 11 June)
    - What would be cool... (CONNEG vs. discovery) Simon St.Laurent (Sunday, 11 June)
    - Re: PUBLIC/SYSTEM distinction (was Re: typo/bug in the namespace spec) Simon St.Laurent (Sunday, 11 June)
FW: D. Carlisle lone user (was : Microsoft tools) James O. Luke (Friday, 9 June)
OID URN namespace.... Michael Mealling (Friday, 9 June)
XML Base and XPath absolutizing of URIs John Boyer (Thursday, 8 June)
- Re: XML Base and XPath absolutizing of URIs Paul Grosso (Thursday, 8 June)
  - RE: XML Base and XPath absolutizing of URIs John Boyer (Thursday, 8 June)
    - Re: XML Base and XPath absolutizing of URIs Jonathan Borden (Thursday, 8 June)
    - RE: XML Base and XPath absolutizing of URIs John Boyer (Friday, 9 June)
    - Re: XML Base and XPath absolutizing of URIs David Carlisle (Monday, 12 June)
- Re: XML Base and XPath absolutizing of URIs Donald E. Eastlake 3rd (Thursday, 8 June)
A proposed solution David Turner (Thursday, 8 June)
- Microsoft tools David Carlisle (Thursday, 8 June)
- Re: A proposed solution David Carlisle (Thursday, 8 June)
  - Re: A proposed solution Henrik Frystyk Nielsen (Friday, 9 June)
    - Literal Approach + Locality Warning (Was: A proposed solution Clark C. Evans (Friday, 9 June)
    - Re: Literal Approach + Locality Warning (Was: A proposed solution Henrik Frystyk Nielsen (Friday, 9 June)
    - Re: A proposed solution Jonathan Borden (Friday, 9 June)
- Re: A proposed solution Dan Connolly (Thursday, 8 June)
  - Re: A proposed solution Jonathan Borden (Thursday, 8 June)
    - Re: A proposed solution Henrik Frystyk Nielsen (Friday, 9 June)
    - Re: A proposed solution Al Gilman (Friday, 9 June)
    - Re: A proposed solution John Cowan (Friday, 9 June)
    - Re: A proposed solution Simon St.Laurent (Friday, 9 June)
    - Re: A proposed solution (base edge cases) Dan Connolly (Friday, 9 June)
    - Re: A proposed solution John Cowan (Friday, 9 June)
    - Re: A proposed solution Simon St.Laurent (Saturday, 10 June)
    - Re: A proposed solution Henrik Frystyk Nielsen (Saturday, 10 June)
    - Re: A proposed solution Simon St.Laurent (Friday, 9 June)
    - Re: A proposed solution Henrik Frystyk Nielsen (Saturday, 10 June)
- Re: A proposed solution Frystyk (Thursday, 8 June)
- Re: A proposed solution Paul Grosso (Thursday, 8 June)
  - Re: A proposed solution Jonathan Borden (Thursday, 8 June)
- Re: A proposed solution Paul Grosso (Thursday, 8 June)
  - Re: A proposed solution Jonathan Borden (Friday, 9 June)
  - Compromise?: absolutize but require xml:base Jonathan Borden (Friday, 9 June)
    - Re: Compromise?: absolutize but require xml:base Simon St.Laurent (Friday, 9 June)
    - Re: Compromise?: absolutize but require xml:base keshlam@us.ibm.com (Friday, 9 June)
- Re: A proposed solution David Carlisle (Friday, 9 June)
  - Re: A proposed solution Henrik Frystyk Nielsen (Saturday, 10 June)
    - Re: A proposed solution John Cowan (Saturday, 10 June)
    - Re: A proposed solution Henrik Frystyk Nielsen (Saturday, 10 June)
- Re: A proposed solution David Carlisle (Friday, 9 June)
  - Re: A proposed solution Henrik Frystyk Nielsen (Saturday, 10 June)
    - RE: A proposed solution Larry Masinter (Saturday, 10 June)
    - Re: A proposed solution John Cowan (Sunday, 11 June)
    - Re: A proposed solution Henrik Frystyk Nielsen (Sunday, 11 June)
    - Re: A proposed solution James Clark (Thursday, 15 June)
    - Re: A proposed solution Paul W. Abrahams (Thursday, 15 June)
    - Re: A proposed solution Simon St.Laurent (Thursday, 15 June)
    - Re: A proposed solution Paul W. Abrahams (Thursday, 15 June)
- Re: A proposed solution James Clark (Saturday, 10 June)
  - Re: A proposed solution Clark C. Evans (Saturday, 10 June)
  - Re: A proposed solution Henrik Frystyk Nielsen (Sunday, 11 June)
    - Re: A proposed solution James Clark (Thursday, 15 June)
    - RE: A proposed solution Larry Masinter (Thursday, 15 June)
    - RE: A proposed solution Simon St.Laurent (Thursday, 15 June)
    - Oops (was RE: A proposed solution) Simon St.Laurent (Thursday, 15 June)
    - RE: A proposed solution Larry Masinter (Thursday, 15 June)
    - RE: A proposed solution Simon St.Laurent (Thursday, 15 June)
    - Re: A proposed solution Henrik Frystyk Nielsen (Sunday, 18 June)
    - Re: A proposed solution David Carlisle (Sunday, 18 June)
    - Re: A proposed solution Henrik Frystyk Nielsen (Sunday, 18 June)
    - Re: A proposed solution David Carlisle (Sunday, 18 June)
    - Re: A proposed solution Henrik Frystyk Nielsen (Monday, 19 June)
    - Re: A proposed solution David Carlisle (Monday, 19 June)
    - For literals: why I changed my mind Paul W. Abrahams (Monday, 19 June)
    - Re: For literals: why I changed my mind David Carlisle (Monday, 19 June)
    - Re: For literals: why I changed my mind Paul W. Abrahams (Monday, 19 June)
    - Re: For literals: why I changed my mind keshlam@us.ibm.com (Thursday, 22 June)
    - Re: For literals: why I changed my mind Paul W. Abrahams (Friday, 23 June)
    - Re: For literals: why I changed my mind keshlam@us.ibm.com (Friday, 23 June)
    - Re: A proposed solution Henrik Frystyk Nielsen (Monday, 19 June)
    - Re: A proposed solution Simon St.Laurent (Tuesday, 20 June)
    - Re: A proposed solution Daniel Veillard (Tuesday, 20 June)
    - Re: A proposed solution Henrik Frystyk Nielsen (Tuesday, 20 June)
    - no flexibility in using looser comparison in RFC 2557 Larry Masinter (Wednesday, 21 June)
    - Re: A proposed solution Henrik Frystyk Nielsen (Tuesday, 20 June)
- Re: A proposed solution David Carlisle (Saturday, 10 June)
- Re: A proposed solution David Carlisle (Saturday, 10 June)
- Re: A proposed solution David Carlisle (Saturday, 10 June)
- Re: A proposed solution Paul W. Abrahams (Tuesday, 13 June)
- Re: A proposed solution Tim Berners-Lee (Thursday, 15 June)
  - No more tangents (Was: A proposed solution) Clark C. Evans (Thursday, 15 June)
    - Re: No more tangents (Was: A proposed solution) David Carlisle (Thursday, 15 June)
Re: Re Deprecate/Undefined (was Request for status dump and issues check) keshlam@us.ibm.com (Thursday, 8 June)
- Re: Re Deprecate/Undefined (was Request for status dump and issues check) David Carlisle (Thursday, 8 June)
- Re: Re Deprecate/Undefined (was Request for status dump and issues check) keshlam@us.ibm.com (Friday, 23 June)
- Re: Re Deprecate/Undefined (was Request for status dump and issues check) keshlam@us.ibm.com (Friday, 23 June)
  - Re: Re Deprecate/Undefined (was Request for status dump and issues check) John Cowan (Friday, 23 June)
  - Re: Re Deprecate/Undefined (was Request for status dump and issues check) David Carlisle (Friday, 23 June)
    - Re: Re Deprecate/Undefined (was Request for status dump and issues check) David G. Durand (Friday, 23 June)
    - Re: Re Deprecate/Undefined (was Request for status dump and issues check) David Carlisle (Saturday, 24 June)
    - Re: Re Deprecate/Undefined (was Request for status dump and issues check) Daniel Veillard (Friday, 23 June)
    - <a:b:c> and xlink David Carlisle (Saturday, 24 June)
    - Re: <a:b:c> and xlink Daniel Veillard (Saturday, 24 June)
- Re: Re Deprecate/Undefined (was Request for status dump and issues check) keshlam@us.ibm.com (Monday, 26 June)
Re: Re Deprecate/Undefined (was Request for status dump and issues check) Paul Grosso (Thursday, 8 June)
Re: On, and on, and on... was: Mechanism, not policy [was: Attribute uniqueness...] keshlam@us.ibm.com (Thursday, 8 June)
- Re: On, and on, and on... Simon St.Laurent (Thursday, 8 June)
  - Re: On, and on, and on... David Carlisle (Thursday, 8 June)
Re Deprecate/Undefined (was Request for status dump and issues check) keshlam@us.ibm.com (Thursday, 8 June)
- Re: Re Deprecate/Undefined (was Request for status dump and issues check) David Carlisle (Thursday, 8 June)
- Re: Re Deprecate/Undefined (was Request for status dump and issues check) Dan Connolly (Friday, 23 June)
  - Re: Re Deprecate/Undefined (was Request for status dump and issues check) David G. Durand (Friday, 23 June)
  - Re: Re Deprecate/Undefined (was Request for status dump and issues check) James Clark (Saturday, 24 June)
    - Re: Re Deprecate/Undefined (was Request for status dump and issues check) Henry S. Thompson (Tuesday, 27 June)
    - Re: Re Deprecate/Undefined (was Request for status dump and issues check) Dan Connolly (Tuesday, 27 June)
    - Re: Re Deprecate/Undefined (was Request for status dump and issues check) Dan Connolly (Thursday, 29 June)
    - Re: Re Deprecate/Undefined (was Request for status dump and issues check) james anderson (Friday, 30 June)
  - Re: Re Deprecate/Undefined (was Request for status dump and issues check) David Carlisle (Saturday, 24 June)
  - Re: Re Deprecate/Undefined (was Request for status dump and issues check) Tim Bray (Sunday, 25 June)
    - The Kesselman/Connoly proposal (was Re: Re Deprecate/Undefined ) Michael Champion (Sunday, 25 June)
    - Re: The Kesselman/Connoly proposal (was Re: Re Deprecate/Undefined ) Simon St.Laurent (Sunday, 25 June)
  - Re: Re Deprecate/Undefined (was Request for status dump and issues check) David Carlisle (Sunday, 25 June)
    - Re: Deprecate/Undefined (was Request for status dump and issues check) Michael Champion (Monday, 26 June)
Uncertainty on xml-dev John Cowan (Thursday, 8 June)
- Re: Uncertainty on xml-dev keshlam@us.ibm.com (Thursday, 8 June)
  - Re: Uncertainty on xml-dev John Aldridge (Thursday, 8 June)
- Re: Uncertainty on xml-dev Al Gilman (Thursday, 8 June)
  - Re: Uncertainty on xml-dev David Carlisle (Thursday, 8 June)
    - Re: Uncertainty on xml-dev Al Gilman (Friday, 9 June)
    - Re: Uncertainty on xml-dev David Carlisle (Friday, 9 June)
- Re: Uncertainty on xml-dev james anderson (Thursday, 8 June)
  - Re: Uncertainty on xml-dev David Carlisle (Thursday, 8 June)
    - Re: Uncertainty on xml-dev james anderson (Friday, 9 June)
- Re: Uncertainty on xml-dev keshlam@us.ibm.com (Thursday, 8 June)
The "deprecate/fixed-base" option John Cowan (Wednesday, 7 June)
- Re: The "deprecate/fixed-base" option Michael Mealling (Thursday, 8 June)
- Re: The "deprecate/fixed-base" option David Carlisle (Thursday, 8 June)
- Re: The "deprecate/fixed-base" option David Carlisle (Thursday, 8 June)
  - Re: The "deprecate/fixed-base" option Clark C. Evans (Thursday, 8 June)
    - Re: The "deprecate/fixed-base" option David Carlisle (Thursday, 8 June)
- Re: The "deprecate/fixed-base" option keshlam@us.ibm.com (Thursday, 8 June)
- Re: The "deprecate/fixed-base" option Tim Berners-Lee (Wednesday, 14 June)
  - Re: The "deprecate/fixed-base" option David Carlisle (Wednesday, 14 June)
    - Re: The "deprecate/fixed-base" option David G. Durand (Wednesday, 14 June)
Re: A new proposal (was: Re: which layer for URI processing?) keshlam@us.ibm.com (Wednesday, 7 June)
New text for Namespaces 2.0 Paul W. Abrahams (Tuesday, 6 June)
Re: how does XML Base affects well-formedness? [was: red/green XML] Paul Grosso (Tuesday, 6 June)
Re: how does XML Base affects well-formedness? [was: red/green XML] keshlam@us.ibm.com (Tuesday, 6 June)
how does XML Base affects well-formedness? [was: red/green XML] Paul Grosso (Tuesday, 6 June)
what "huge problem" with XML Base? [was: red/green XML] Paul Grosso (Tuesday, 6 June)
- Re: what "huge problem" with XML Base? [was: red/green XML] Eric van der Vlist (Tuesday, 6 June)
- Re: what "huge problem" with XML Base? [was: red/green XML] Paul Grosso (Tuesday, 6 June)
- Re: what "huge problem" with XML Base? [was: red/green XML] Jonathan Borden (Tuesday, 6 June)
  - Re: what "huge problem" with XML Base? [was: red/green XML] John Cowan (Tuesday, 6 June)
    - Re: what "huge problem" with XML Base? [was: red/green XML] Jonathan Borden (Tuesday, 6 June)
    - well-structured? was: RE: what "huge problem" with XML Base? [was: red/green XML] Jonathan Borden (Wednesday, 7 June)
- Re: what "huge problem" with XML Base? [was: red/green XML] Jonathan Borden (Tuesday, 6 June)
Is a namesapce a resource? - was: duck Tim Berners-Lee (Tuesday, 6 June)
- Re: Is a namespace a resource? - was: duck Al Gilman (Tuesday, 6 June)
  - Re: Is a namespace a resource? - was: duck John Cowan (Tuesday, 6 June)
- Re: Is a namesapce a resource? - was: duck David Carlisle (Tuesday, 6 June)
- Re: Is a namesapce a resource? - was: duck John Cowan (Tuesday, 6 June)
- Re: Is a namesapce a resource? - was: duck Rick JELLIFFE (Wednesday, 7 June)
  - Re: Is a namesapce a resource? - was: duck David Carlisle (Wednesday, 7 June)
  - Re: Is a namesapce a resource? - was: duck Graham Klyne (Thursday, 8 June)
    - Re: Is a namesapce a resource? - was: duck David Carlisle (Thursday, 8 June)
    - Re: Is a namesapce a resource? - was: duck Dan Connolly (Thursday, 8 June)
    - Re: Is a namesapce a resource? - was: duck Graham Klyne (Thursday, 8 June)
    - Re: Is a namesapce a resource? - was: duck David Carlisle (Thursday, 8 June)
    - Reasons to use namespaces Graham Klyne (Thursday, 8 June)
    - Re: Reasons to use namespaces David Carlisle (Thursday, 8 June)
- RE: Is a namesapce a resource? - was: duck Bill dehOra (Thursday, 8 June)
- Re: Is a namesapce a resource? - was: duck keshlam@us.ibm.com (Thursday, 8 June)
  - Re: Is a namesapce a resource? - was: duck David Carlisle (Thursday, 8 June)
- Re: Is a namesapce a resource? - was: duck keshlam@us.ibm.com (Thursday, 8 June)
  - Re: Is a namesapce a resource? - was: duck David Carlisle (Thursday, 8 June)
  - Re: Is a namesapce a resource? - was: duck David Carlisle (Friday, 9 June)
    - Re: Is a namespace [always] a [shared] resource? Al Gilman (Friday, 9 June)
    - Re: Is a namespace [always] a [shared] resource? keshlam@us.ibm.com (Friday, 9 June)
    - Re: Is a namespace [always] a [shared] resource? Al Gilman (Friday, 9 June)
    - Re: Is a namespace [always] a [shared] resource? Clark C. Evans (Friday, 9 June)
- Re: Is a namesapce a resource? - was: duck David Carlisle (Friday, 9 June)
- Re: Is a namesapce a resource? - was: duck keshlam@us.ibm.com (Friday, 9 June)
  - Re: Is a namesapce a resource? - was: duck John Cowan (Friday, 9 June)
    - Re: Is a namesapce a resource? - was: duck David Carlisle (Friday, 9 June)
- Re: Is a namesapce a resource? - was: duck David Carlisle (Friday, 9 June)
  - Re: Is a namesapce a resource? - was: duck james anderson (Monday, 12 June)
    - Re: Is a namesapce a resource? - was: duck David Carlisle (Monday, 12 June)
- RE: Is a namesapce a resource? - was: duck Michael Rys (Friday, 9 June)
- Re: Is a namesapce a resource? - was: duck keshlam@us.ibm.com (Monday, 12 June)
  - Re: Is a namesapce a resource? - was: duck David Carlisle (Monday, 12 June)
- Re: Is a namesapce a resource? - was: duck keshlam@us.ibm.com (Tuesday, 13 June)
Yet Another Modest Proposal: [was] Minimum required of a system called "Namespaces in XML" Sam Hunting (Tuesday, 6 June)
Banning relative - No real damage? Tim Berners-Lee (Monday, 5 June)
- Re: Banning relative - No real damage? David Carlisle (Monday, 5 June)
  - RE: Banning relative - No real damage? Julian Reschke (Tuesday, 6 June)
- Re: Banning relative - No real damage? Sam Hunting (Tuesday, 6 June)
  - Re: Banning relative - No real damage? David Carlisle (Tuesday, 6 June)
- Re: Banning relative - No real damage? David Carlisle (Tuesday, 6 June)
- Re: Banning relative - No real damage? Tim Bray (Wednesday, 7 June)
  - Re: Banning relative - No real damage? John Cowan (Wednesday, 7 June)
    - Re: Banning relative - No real damage? David Carlisle (Wednesday, 7 June)
    - Re: Banning relative - No real damage? John Cowan (Wednesday, 7 June)
    - Re: Banning relative - No real damage? David Carlisle (Wednesday, 7 June)
  - rel:foo for those who can't do without 'relative' URIs Jonathan Borden (Wednesday, 7 June)
    - Re: rel:foo for those who can't do without 'relative' URIs keshlam@us.ibm.com (Wednesday, 7 June)
    - RE: rel:foo for those who can't do without 'relative' URIs Jonathan Borden (Wednesday, 7 June)
    - Re: rel:foo for those who can't do without 'relative' URIs Tim Berners-Lee (Thursday, 8 June)
    - Re: rel:foo for those who can't do without 'relative' URIs Tim Berners-Lee (Thursday, 8 June)
    - Re: rel:foo for those who can't do without 'relative' URIs Jonathan Borden (Thursday, 8 June)
- Re: Banning relative - No real damage? keshlam@us.ibm.com (Wednesday, 7 June)
  - Re: Banning relative - No real damage? Simon St.Laurent (Wednesday, 7 June)
    - Re: Banning relative - No real damage? David Carlisle (Wednesday, 7 June)
    - Re: Banning relative - No real damage? Al Gilman (Wednesday, 7 June)
    - Re: Banning relative - No real damage? David Carlisle (Wednesday, 7 June)
- Re: Banning relative - No real damage? keshlam@us.ibm.com (Wednesday, 7 June)
- Re: Banning relative - No real damage? keshlam@us.ibm.com (Wednesday, 7 June)
- RE: Banning relative - No real damage? Michael Rys (Friday, 9 June)
- Re: Banning relative - No real damage? Tim Berners-Lee (Wednesday, 14 June)
  - Is file:///foo a URI? Graham Klyne (Thursday, 15 June)
    - Re: Is file:///foo a URI? keshlam@us.ibm.com (Thursday, 15 June)
    - RE: Is file:///foo a URI? Larry Masinter (Thursday, 15 June)
- RE: Banning relative - No real damage? Michael Rys (Wednesday, 14 June)
Request for status dump and issues check keshlam@us.ibm.com (Monday, 5 June)
- RE: Request for status dump and issues check Larry Masinter (Monday, 5 June)
  - Re: Request for status dump and issues check Michael Mealling (Monday, 5 June)
  - Re: Request for status dump and issues check David Carlisle (Monday, 5 June)
- Re: Request for status dump and issues check John Cowan (Monday, 5 June)
  - Re: Request for status dump and issues check David Carlisle (Monday, 5 June)
- Re: Request for status dump and issues check keshlam@us.ibm.com (Monday, 5 June)
- Re: Request for status dump and issues check Simon St.Laurent (Monday, 5 June)
- Re: Request for status dump and issues check keshlam@us.ibm.com (Monday, 5 June)
  - Re: Request for status dump and issues check John Cowan (Monday, 5 June)
  - Re: Request for status dump and issues check Michael Mealling (Monday, 5 June)
- Re: Request for status dump and issues check Tim Berners-Lee (Thursday, 8 June)
  - General concerns (was Re: Request for status dump...) Simon St.Laurent (Thursday, 8 June)
  - Re: Request for status dump and issues check David Carlisle (Thursday, 8 June)
  - Making the namespace resource "real" Clark C. Evans (Thursday, 8 June)
    - RE: Making the namespace resource "real" Julian Reschke (Thursday, 8 June)
    - Re: Making the namespace resource "real" David Carlisle (Thursday, 8 June)
    - RE: Making the namespace resource "real" keshlam@us.ibm.com (Thursday, 8 June)
    - RE: Making the namespace resource "real" Julian Reschke (Thursday, 8 June)
- Re: Request for status dump and issues check keshlam@us.ibm.com (Thursday, 8 June)
a personal conclusion..... Michael Mealling (Friday, 2 June)
- Re: a personal conclusion..... Simon St.Laurent (Friday, 2 June)
  - Re: a personal conclusion..... Michael Mealling (Friday, 2 June)
    - Re: a personal conclusion..... Simon St.Laurent (Friday, 2 June)
    - Can we get past these @#X! axioms? Simon St.Laurent (Friday, 2 June)
"data:,<name>" proposal adds an extra level Larry Masinter (Friday, 2 June)
- Re: "data:,<name>" proposal adds an extra level John Cowan (Friday, 2 June)
Base-less fears (was Moving On...) Jonathan Marsh (Thursday, 1 June)
- Re: Base-less fears (was Moving On...) Tim Berners-Lee (Saturday, 3 June)
Re: Tim Berners-Lee (Thursday, 1 June)
- Re: John Cowan (Thursday, 1 June)
- Re: Ray Whitmer (Friday, 2 June)
- Re: Tim Berners-Lee (Thursday, 15 June)
- Re: Tim Berners-Lee (Monday, 19 June)
  - Re: David Carlisle (Monday, 19 June)
  - (no subject) David G. Durand (Monday, 19 June)
Re: Chaos, Process Tim Berners-Lee (Thursday, 1 June)
- Re: Chaos, Process Simon St.Laurent (Friday, 2 June)
- Re: Chaos, Process Sam Hunting (Friday, 2 June)
  - Re: Chaos, Process Dan Connolly (Friday, 2 June)
    - Re: Chaos, Process Simon St.Laurent (Friday, 2 June)
- Re: Chaos, Process Sam Hunting (Friday, 2 June)
- Re: Chaos, Process Sam Hunting (Friday, 2 June)
  - XML 1.0 in flux Simon St.Laurent (Friday, 2 June)
    - Re: XML 1.0 in flux Paul W. Abrahams (Saturday, 3 June)
    - Re: XML 1.0 in flux Simon St.Laurent (Saturday, 3 June)
    - Re: XML 1.0 in flux Sam Hunting (Saturday, 3 June)
    - Namespaces and XML 2.0 (Was: XML 1.0 in flux) Paul W. Abrahams (Saturday, 3 June)
- Re: Chaos, Process Tim Berners-Lee (Saturday, 3 June)
- Re: Chaos, Process Sam Hunting (Saturday, 3 June)
RE: URIs quack like a duck Arnold, Curt (Thursday, 1 June)
- Re: URIs quack like a duck Paul W. Abrahams (Friday, 2 June)
Re: Namespace names: a modification of a semi-serious proposal Tim Berners-Lee (Thursday, 1 June)
- Re: Namespace names: a modification of a semi-serious proposal Paul W. Abrahams (Thursday, 1 June)
- Re: Namespace names: a modification of a semi-serious proposal Tim Berners-Lee (Thursday, 1 June)
  - Re: Namespace names: a modification of a semi-serious proposal John Cowan (Thursday, 1 June)
    - Terminology Clark C. Evans (Friday, 2 June)
    - Re: Terminology John Cowan (Friday, 2 June)
a clarification? Michael Mealling (Thursday, 1 June)
- Re: a clarification? David Carlisle (Thursday, 1 June)
  - Re: a clarification? John Cowan (Thursday, 1 June)
    - Re: a clarification? David Carlisle (Thursday, 1 June)
- Re: a clarification? Paul W. Abrahams (Thursday, 1 June)
- Re: a clarification? Tim Berners-Lee (Saturday, 3 June)
  - Re: a clarification? David Carlisle (Saturday, 3 June)
Comparing URI references as strings David Carlisle (Thursday, 1 June)
Re: Injective Quality (Was: Re: URIs quack like a duck) Graham Klyne (Wednesday, 31 May)
- Re: Injective Quality (Was: Re: URIs quack like a duck) Tim Berners-Lee (Thursday, 1 June)
  - Re: Injective Quality (Was: Re: URIs quack like a duck) David Carlisle (Thursday, 1 June)
- Re: Injective Quality (Was: Re: URIs quack like a duck) Tim Berners-Lee (Friday, 2 June)
  - Re: Injective Quality (Was: Re: URIs quack like a duck) John Cowan (Friday, 2 June)
  - on relative URI references David Carlisle (Friday, 2 June)
    - Re: on relative URI references Tim Berners-Lee (Saturday, 3 June)
    - Re: on relative URI references David Carlisle (Saturday, 3 June)
    - Re: on relative URI references Tim Berners-Lee (Tuesday, 6 June)
    - Re: on relative URI references David Carlisle (Tuesday, 6 June)
    - Re: on relative URI references David Carlisle (Wednesday, 7 June)
- Re: Injective Quality (Was: Re: URIs quack like a duck) Tim Berners-Lee (Saturday, 3 June)
  - Re: Injective Quality (Was: Re: URIs quack like a duck) John Cowan (Saturday, 3 June)
Re: RDF/XML/Internet Collisons, Process (was Moving on) Graham Klyne (Thursday, 1 June)
Re: Moving on (was Re: URIs quack like a duck) David Carlisle (Thursday, 1 June)
- Re: Moving on (was Re: URIs quack like a duck) David Carlisle (Thursday, 1 June)
  - Re: Moving on (was Re: URIs quack like a duck) Michael Mealling (Thursday, 1 June)
    - Re: Moving on (was Re: URIs quack like a duck) Paul W. Abrahams (Thursday, 1 June)
    - Re: Moving on (was Re: URIs quack like a duck) Michael Mealling (Thursday, 1 June)
    - Re: Moving on (was Re: URIs quack like a duck) Paul W. Abrahams (Thursday, 1 June)
    - Re: Moving on (was Re: URIs quack like a duck) Michael Mealling (Thursday, 1 June)
    - Re: Moving on (was Re: URIs quack like a duck) Paul W. Abrahams (Thursday, 1 June)
    - Re: Moving on (was Re: URIs quack like a duck) Michael Mealling (Thursday, 1 June)
    - Re: Moving on (was Re: URIs quack like a duck) David Carlisle (Thursday, 1 June)
    - Re: Moving on (was Re: URIs quack like a duck) Michael Mealling (Thursday, 1 June)
    - Re: Moving on (was Re: URIs quack like a duck) David Carlisle (Thursday, 1 June)
    - Re: Moving on (was Re: URIs quack like a duck) Paul W. Abrahams (Thursday, 1 June)
    - The 'resource' identified by a namespace name URI should be the namespace Larry Masinter (Thursday, 1 June)
    - Re: The 'resource' identified by a namespace name URI should be the namespace David Carlisle (Thursday, 1 June)
    - Re: The 'resource' identified by a namespace name URI should be the namespace Simon St.Laurent (Thursday, 1 June)
    - Re: The 'resource' identified by a namespace name URI should be the namespace Clark C. Evans (Thursday, 1 June)
    - Re: The 'resource' identified by a namespace name URI should be the namespace Michael Mealling (Thursday, 1 June)
    - Re: The 'resource' identified by a namespace name URI should be the namespace John Cowan (Thursday, 1 June)
    - Re: The 'resource' identified by a namespace name URI should be the namespace Michael Mealling (Thursday, 1 June)
    - Re: The 'resource' identified by a namespace name URI should be the namespace John Cowan (Thursday, 1 June)
    - Re: The 'resource' identified by a namespace name URI should be the namespace Michael Mealling (Thursday, 1 June)
    - Re: The 'resource' identified by a namespace name URI should be the namespace John Cowan (Thursday, 1 June)
    - Re: The 'resource' identified by a namespace name URI should be the namespace Michael Mealling (Thursday, 1 June)
    - Re: The 'resource' identified by a namespace name URI should be the namespace John Cowan (Thursday, 1 June)
    - Re: The 'resource' identified by a namespace name URI should be the namespace Clark C. Evans (Friday, 2 June)
    - Re: The 'resource' identified by a namespace name URI should be the namespace Michael Mealling (Friday, 2 June)
    - Re: The 'resource' identified by a namespace name URI should be the namespace John Cowan (Thursday, 1 June)
    - Re: The 'resource' identified by a namespace name URI should be the namespace Michael Mealling (Friday, 2 June)
    - Re: The 'resource' identified by a namespace name URI should be the namespace David Carlisle (Friday, 2 June)
    - Re: The 'resource' identified by a namespace name URI should be the namespace Michael Mealling (Friday, 2 June)
    - Re: The 'resource' identified by a namespace name URI should be the namespace John Cowan (Friday, 2 June)
    - Re: The 'resource' identified by a namespace name URI should be the namespace Michael Mealling (Friday, 2 June)
    - Re: The 'resource' identified by a namespace name URI should be the namespace John Cowan (Friday, 2 June)
    - Re: The 'resource' identified by a namespace name URI should be the namespace Michael Mealling (Friday, 2 June)
    - Re: The 'resource' identified by a namespace name URI should be the namespace John Cowan (Friday, 2 June)
    - Re: The 'resource' identified by a namespace name URI should be the namespace Michael Mealling (Friday, 2 June)
    - Re: The 'resource' identified by a namespace name URI should be the namespace John Cowan (Friday, 2 June)
    - RE: The 'resource' identified by a namespace name URI should be the namespace Larry Masinter (Saturday, 3 June)
    - Re: The 'resource' identified by a namespace name URI should be the namespace John Cowan (Friday, 2 June)
    - Re: The 'resource' identified by a namespace name URI should be the namespace Clark C. Evans (Sunday, 4 June)
    - Re: The 'resource' identified by a namespace name URI should be the namespace Michael Mealling (Monday, 5 June)
    - RE: The 'resource' identified by a namespace name URI should be the namespace Graham Klyne (Monday, 5 June)
    - Re: The 'resource' identified by a namespace name URI should be the namespace Michael Mealling (Monday, 5 June)
    - Re: The 'resource' identified by a namespace name URI should be the namespace John Cowan (Friday, 2 June)
    - Re: The 'resource' identified by a namespace name URI should be the namespace John Cowan (Friday, 2 June)
    - Re: The 'resource' identified by a namespace name URI should be the John Cowan (Thursday, 1 June)
    - namespaces include their name => 1-1 Larry Masinter (Friday, 2 June)
    - Re: namespaces include their name => 1-1 John Cowan (Friday, 2 June)
    - Re: namespaces include their name => 1-1 David Carlisle (Friday, 2 June)
    - Re: namespaces include their name => 1-1 Tim Berners-Lee (Saturday, 3 June)
    - YAMP: ns-attr is a _mark_, not a _name_ for the namespace Al Gilman (Friday, 2 June)
    - Re: The 'resource' identified by a namespace name URI should be the namespace Clark C. Evans (Thursday, 1 June)
    - Re: The 'resource' identified by a namespace name URI should be the namespace Tim Berners-Lee (Saturday, 3 June)
    - fundamental differences? (again) (was The 'resource') Simon St.Laurent (Saturday, 3 June)
    - Re: The 'resource' identified by a namespace name URI should be the namespace Tim Berners-Lee (Saturday, 3 June)
    - Re: The 'resource' identified by a namespace name URI should be the namespace John Cowan (Saturday, 3 June)
    - Re: The 'resource' identified by a namespace name URI should be the namespace Graham Klyne (Monday, 5 June)
    - Re: The 'resource' identified by a namespace name URI should be the namespace Liam Quin (Saturday, 3 June)
    - RE: The 'resource' identified by a namespace name URI should be the namespace Larry Masinter (Saturday, 3 June)
    - Re: The 'resource' identified by a namespace name URI should be the namespace Tim Berners-Lee (Saturday, 3 June)
    - Re: The 'resource' identified by a namespace name URI should be the namespace John Cowan (Saturday, 3 June)
    - Re: The 'resource' identified by a namespace name URI should be the namespace Dan Brickley (Saturday, 3 June)
    - Re: The 'resource' identified by a namespace name URI should be the namespace John Aldridge (Monday, 5 June)
    - Re: The 'resource' identified by a namespace name URI should be the namespace Michael Mealling (Monday, 5 June)
    - Re: The 'resource' identified by a namespace name URI should be the namespace John Aldridge (Monday, 5 June)
    - Re: The 'resource' identified by a namespace name URI should be the namespace John Cowan (Monday, 5 June)
    - Re: The 'resource' identified by a namespace name URI should be the namespace John Aldridge (Monday, 5 June)
    - Re: The 'resource' identified by a namespace name URI should be the namespace Dan Brickley (Monday, 5 June)
    - Re: The 'resource' identified by a namespace name URI should be the namespace John Aldridge (Monday, 5 June)
    - Re: The 'resource' identified by a namespace name URI should be the namespace Dan Brickley (Monday, 5 June)
    - Re: The 'resource' identified by a namespace name URI should be the namespace David Carlisle (Monday, 5 June)
    - Re: The 'resource' identified by a namespace name URI should be the namespace keshlam@us.ibm.com (Wednesday, 7 June)
    - Re: The 'resource' identified by a namespace name URI should be the namespace Al Gilman (Thursday, 1 June)
    - Re: The 'resource' identified by a namespace name URI should be the namespace Tim Berners-Lee (Saturday, 3 June)
    - fundamental difference? Simon St.Laurent (Saturday, 3 June)
    - Re: fundamental difference? Tim Berners-Lee (Saturday, 3 June)
    - Re: fundamental difference? Simon St.Laurent (Saturday, 3 June)
    - Re: fundamental difference? W. E. Perry (Saturday, 3 June)
    - Minimum required of a system called "Namespaces in XML" David Carlisle (Sunday, 4 June)
    - Re: Minimum required of a system called "Namespaces in XML" Michael Mealling (Monday, 5 June)
    - Re: Minimum required of a system called "Namespaces in XML" David Carlisle (Monday, 5 June)
    - Re: Minimum required of a system called "Namespaces in XML" Michael Mealling (Monday, 5 June)
    - Re: Minimum required of a system called "Namespaces in XML" John Cowan (Monday, 5 June)
    - Re: Minimum required of a system called "Namespaces in XML" David Carlisle (Monday, 5 June)
    - RFC 2557 (MHTML) uses byte-equality after absolutizing Larry Masinter (Tuesday, 6 June)
    - Re: RFC 2557 (MHTML) uses byte-equality after absolutizing Simon St.Laurent (Tuesday, 6 June)
    - Re: Minimum required of a system called "Namespaces in XML" Graham Klyne (Monday, 5 June)
    - Re: Minimum required of a system called "Namespaces in XML" David Carlisle (Monday, 5 June)
    - Re: Minimum required of a system called "Namespaces in XML" Paul W. Abrahams (Tuesday, 6 June)
    - Re: Minimum required of a system called "Namespaces in XML" David Carlisle (Tuesday, 6 June)
    - Re: Minimum required of a system called "Namespaces in XML" keshlam@us.ibm.com (Monday, 12 June)
    - Re: Minimum required of a system called "Namespaces in XML" Michael Mealling (Monday, 12 June)
    - Re: Minimum required of a system called "Namespaces in XML" Simon St.Laurent (Monday, 12 June)
    - Re: Is a namesapce a resource? - was: duck David Carlisle (Monday, 12 June)
    - Re: Minimum required of a system called "Namespaces in XML" Paul W. Abrahams (Tuesday, 13 June)
    - Re: Minimum required of a system called "Namespaces in XML" keshlam@us.ibm.com (Monday, 12 June)
    - Re: Minimum required of a system called "Namespaces in XML" Tim Bray (Monday, 12 June)
    - Re: The 'resource' identified by a namespace name URI should be the namespace Tim Berners-Lee (Saturday, 3 June)
    - Re: The 'resource' identified by a namespace name URI should be the namespace John Cowan (Saturday, 3 June)
    - Common Sense! Was: Re: The 'resource' identified by a namespace name URI should be the namespace Clark C. Evans (Saturday, 3 June)
    - Re: Common Sense! Was: Re: The 'resource' identified by a namespace name URI should be the namespace Al Gilman (Saturday, 3 June)
    - Re: Common Sense! Was: Re: The 'resource' identified by a namespace name URI should be the namespace John Cowan (Sunday, 4 June)
    - Re: Common Sense! Was: Re: The 'resource' identified by a namespace name URI should be the namespace Clark C. Evans (Sunday, 4 June)
    - Re: Common Sense! Was: Re: The 'resource' identified by a namespace name URI should be the namespace Michael Mealling (Monday, 5 June)
    - Re: Common Sense! Was: Re: The 'resource' identified by a namespace name URI should be the namespace Tim Berners-Lee (Tuesday, 6 June)
    - Re: Common Sense! Was: Re: The 'resource' identified by a namespace name URI should be the namespace Simon St.Laurent (Tuesday, 6 June)
    - Re: Common Sense! Was: Re: The 'resource' identified by a namespace name URI should be the namespace David Carlisle (Tuesday, 6 June)
    - Re: Common Sense! Was: Re: The 'resource' identified by a namespace name URI should be the namespace John Aldridge (Wednesday, 7 June)
    - Re: Common Sense! Was: Re: The 'resource' identified by a namespace name URI should be the namespace John Aldridge (Wednesday, 7 June)
    - Re: Common Sense! Was: Re: The 'resource' identified by a namespace name URI should be the namespace David Carlisle (Wednesday, 7 June)
    - Re: The 'resource' identified by a namespace name URI should be the namespace David Carlisle (Saturday, 3 June)
    - Re: The 'resource' identified by a namespace name URI should be the namespace John Aldridge (Monday, 5 June)
    - Re: The 'resource' identified by a namespace name URI should be the namespace Paul W. Abrahams (Tuesday, 6 June)
    - Re: The 'resource' identified by a namespace name URI should be the namespace David Carlisle (Tuesday, 6 June)
    - Re: The 'resource' identified by a namespace name URI should be the namespace Paul W. Abrahams (Tuesday, 6 June)
    - Re: The 'resource' identified by a namespace name URI should be the namespace David Carlisle (Tuesday, 6 June)
    - Re: The 'resource' identified by a namespace name URI should be the namespace Paul W. Abrahams (Tuesday, 6 June)
    - Re: The 'resource' identified by a namespace name URI should be the namespace David Carlisle (Tuesday, 6 June)
    - Re: The 'resource' identified by a namespace name URI should be the namespace John Cowan (Tuesday, 6 June)
    - RE: The 'resource' identified by a namespace name URI should be the namespace Julian Reschke (Tuesday, 6 June)
    - Re: The 'resource' identified by a namespace name URI should be the namespace Paul W. Abrahams (Tuesday, 6 June)
    - Re: The 'resource' identified by a namespace name URI should be the namespace Graham Klyne (Wednesday, 7 June)
    - Re: The 'resource' identified by a namespace name URI should be the namespace Tim Berners-Lee (Wednesday, 7 June)
    - Re: The 'resource' identified by a namespace name URI should be the namespace David Carlisle (Wednesday, 7 June)
    - Re: The 'resource' identified by a namespace name URI should be the namespace Clark C. Evans (Wednesday, 7 June)
    - RE: The 'resource' identified by a namespace name URI should be the namespace Julian Reschke (Wednesday, 7 June)
- Re: Moving on (was Re: URIs quack like a duck) David Carlisle (Thursday, 1 June)
- RE: Moving on (was Re: URIs quack like a duck) Julian Reschke (Thursday, 1 June)
- Re: Moving on (was Re: URIs quack like a duck) Tim Berners-Lee (Thursday, 1 June)
  - Re: Moving on (was Re: URIs quack like a duck) Simon St.Laurent (Friday, 2 June)
  - Re: Moving on (was Re: URIs quack like a duck) David Carlisle (Friday, 2 June)
    - Re: Moving on (was Re: URIs quack like a duck) Al Gilman (Friday, 2 June)
    - Re: Moving on (was Re: URIs quack like a duck) David Carlisle (Friday, 2 June)
    - stepping backward Simon St.Laurent (Friday, 2 June)
    - Re: stepping backward Sam Hunting (Friday, 2 June)
    - Re: stepping backward Simon St.Laurent (Friday, 2 June)
    - Re: stepping backward John Cowan (Friday, 2 June)
    - Re: stepping backward Sam Hunting (Friday, 2 June)
    - Re: stepping backward Simon St.Laurent (Friday, 2 June)
    - Re: stepping backward John Cowan (Friday, 2 June)
    - Re: stepping backward Sam Hunting (Saturday, 3 June)
    - Re: stepping backward (one more step) Al Gilman (Saturday, 3 June)
    - Re: stepping backward (one more step) Graham Klyne (Monday, 5 June)
    - Re: stepping backward (one more step) John Cowan (Monday, 5 June)
    - Re: stepping backward (one more step) Graham Klyne (Monday, 5 June)
    - Re: stepping backward (one more step) John Cowan (Monday, 5 June)
    - Re: Moving on (was Re: URIs quack like a duck) John Cowan (Friday, 2 June)
    - Re: Moving on (was Re: URIs quack like a duck) Simon St.Laurent (Friday, 2 June)
    - <

xml-uri@w3.org from June 2000 by thread