W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > xml-uri@w3.org > June 2000

Re: The 'resource' identified by a namespace name URI should be the namespace

From: John Cowan <jcowan@reutershealth.com>
Date: Fri, 02 Jun 2000 18:13:13 -0400
Message-ID: <39383179.B72173AD@reutershealth.com>
To: michaelm@netsol.com, "xml-uri@w3.org" <xml-uri@w3.org>
Michael Mealling wrote:

> But they don't need to resolve the URI in order to be able to
> reason about it. They just need the URI to act like a URI...

True.  But namespace names are not URIs; they are URI references.
 
> And if you use that URI to name your namespace that is perfectly valid.
> Your just saying that the namespace is named by something that
> also identfies your mailbox. No problems there... A name doesn't
> get to define how or why it gets used, just what it names and how long
> you get to trust that. (plus I would claim that using an email
> address as a namespace name violates the persistence requirement
> that the Rec puts on those names).

One of my email addresses has been around longer than 99% of the .com names on
the Internet.  Why do you think it is not persistent?

-- 

Schlingt dreifach einen Kreis um dies! || John Cowan <jcowan@reutershealth.com>
Schliesst euer Aug vor heiliger Schau,  || http://www.reutershealth.com
Denn er genoss vom Honig-Tau,           || http://www.ccil.org/~cowan
Und trank die Milch vom Paradies.            -- Coleridge (tr. Politzer)
Received on Friday, 2 June 2000 18:13:55 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0 + w3c-0.30 : Tuesday, 12 April 2005 12:17:24 GMT