W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > xml-editor@w3.org > October to December 2008

Re: Comments on XML 1.0 5th edition

From: Colin Adams <colinpauladams@googlemail.com>
Date: Fri, 3 Oct 2008 11:27:26 +0100
Message-ID: <1afdeaec0810030327g58427b9em500e82a3368a9794@mail.gmail.com>
To: "Henry S. Thompson" <ht@inf.ed.ac.uk>
Cc: xml-editor@w3.org

No, it doesn't satisfy me.

It is a straight attempt to re-write history. And as such no W3C
recommendation will be worth anything if it is allowed to pass.

2008/10/3 Henry S. Thompson <ht@inf.ed.ac.uk>:
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> Hash: SHA1
>
> The XML Core WG has responded recently [1] [2] to the two comments you
> endorsed.
>
> As regards the version number point, the evidence cited in [1] and [2]
> - From the implementor community is more encouraging than your
> prediction, and I hope the Eiffel community will follow their example
> if the 5th edition does indeed go forward.
>
> Please let us know if you are satisfied with our response.
>
> ht
>
> [1] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/xml-editor/2008OctDec/0002.html
> [2] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/xml-editor/2008OctDec/0003.html
> - --
>       Henry S. Thompson, School of Informatics, University of Edinburgh
>                         Half-time member of W3C Team
>      10 Crichton Street, Edinburgh EH8 9AB, SCOTLAND -- (44) 131 650-4440
>                Fax: (44) 131 651-1426, e-mail: ht@inf.ed.ac.uk
>                       URL: http://www.ltg.ed.ac.uk/~ht/
> [mail really from me _always_ has this .sig -- mail without it is forged spam]
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
> Version: GnuPG v1.2.6 (GNU/Linux)
>
> iD8DBQFI5fFskjnJixAXWBoRAjDdAKCBLH4lz1k/l23C5jeApH2cYdbuTgCdF+uJ
> xvdbsfAMfVdlPrFwKsbVPac=
> =S+rO
> -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
>
Received on Friday, 3 October 2008 10:28:01 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Monday, 7 December 2009 10:59:40 GMT