- From: David Carlisle <davidc@nag.co.uk>
- Date: Fri, 3 Oct 2008 11:58:02 +0100
- To: ht@inf.ed.ac.uk
- Cc: xml-editor@w3.org
Thanks for the reply. > Please let us know if you are satisfied with our response. Not really, no. In particular I think that your assertion > they referenced a dated version, in which case a new edition will not > affect them, or they referenced the undated version, in which case > they commited themselves to track changes made, Isn't really a fair description. I would say that they trusted, in making such a reference, that the W3C would honour its commitments to keeping the specification stable and not making breaking changes in place. You referenced a clause in the W3C procedures that allows a WG to make changes that affect conformance, but the procedures need to be written to cover any eventuality, it may be that an original spec is sufficiently vague that it's impossible to clarify it without breaking some possibly conformant implementations. But that isn't the case here. Could you answer a simple yes/no question, as to whether on the day the 5th edition is published whether an xpath statement that uses xpath with a "new" Name is conformant to the W3C specifications or not? XPath2 references World Wide Web Consortium. Extensible Markup Language (XML) 1.0. (Third Edition) W3C Recommendation. See http://www.w3.org/TR/REC-xml David ________________________________________________________________________ The Numerical Algorithms Group Ltd is a company registered in England and Wales with company number 1249803. The registered office is: Wilkinson House, Jordan Hill Road, Oxford OX2 8DR, United Kingdom. This e-mail has been scanned for all viruses by Star. The service is powered by MessageLabs. ________________________________________________________________________
Received on Friday, 3 October 2008 10:58:49 UTC