W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > xml-editor@w3.org > October to December 2008

Re: Comments on XML 1.0 5th edition

From: Henry S. Thompson <ht@inf.ed.ac.uk>
Date: Fri, 03 Oct 2008 11:18:19 +0100
To: Colin Adams <colinpauladams@googlemail.com>
Cc: xml-editor@w3.org
Message-ID: <f5bprmic784.fsf@hildegard.inf.ed.ac.uk>

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

The XML Core WG has responded recently [1] [2] to the two comments you
endorsed.

As regards the version number point, the evidence cited in [1] and [2]
- From the implementor community is more encouraging than your
prediction, and I hope the Eiffel community will follow their example
if the 5th edition does indeed go forward.

Please let us know if you are satisfied with our response.

ht
 
[1] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/xml-editor/2008OctDec/0002.html
[2] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/xml-editor/2008OctDec/0003.html
- -- 
       Henry S. Thompson, School of Informatics, University of Edinburgh
                         Half-time member of W3C Team
      10 Crichton Street, Edinburgh EH8 9AB, SCOTLAND -- (44) 131 650-4440
                Fax: (44) 131 651-1426, e-mail: ht@inf.ed.ac.uk
                       URL: http://www.ltg.ed.ac.uk/~ht/
[mail really from me _always_ has this .sig -- mail without it is forged spam]
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.6 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQFI5fFskjnJixAXWBoRAjDdAKCBLH4lz1k/l23C5jeApH2cYdbuTgCdF+uJ
xvdbsfAMfVdlPrFwKsbVPac=
=S+rO
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Received on Friday, 3 October 2008 10:18:59 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Monday, 7 December 2009 10:59:40 GMT