W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > xml-editor@w3.org > October to December 2003

XML 1.1 PR: feedback

From: <ajvincent@juno.com>
Date: Thu, 6 Nov 2003 17:32:10 GMT
To: xml-editor@w3.org
Message-Id: <20031106.093246.17394.659410@webmail13.lax.untd.com>


A few brief comments:

(1) You have editors listed for Second Edition, Third Edition (and presumably, First Edition) in the XML 1.1 Proposed Recommendation.  I would recommend clarifying that to say XML 1.0 First Edition, XML 1.0 Second Edition, XML 1.0 Third Edition, and XML 1.1 First Edition.

(2) In several places, particularly the example code, you use
<?xml version="1.0"

That should change to:
<?xml version="1.1"

(3) Is it at all possible for the xml:space attribute to require the processor remove whitespace?  For instance, whitespace is totally irrelevant in MathML, or almost totally irrelevant.  Nonetheless, this whitespace can have a serious impact on the Document Object Model.  SVG, in most elements, is the same way.

I'll have more commentary later, as I read the specification more this afternoon.



Very Respectfully Yours,



Alexander J. Vincent
author, JavaScript Developer's Dictionary (Sams Publishing, 2002)
moderator, XML Forum @ http://www.codingforums.com
Vallejo, CA, USA



________________________________________________________________
The best thing to hit the internet in years - Juno SpeedBand!
Surf the web up to FIVE TIMES FASTER!
Only $14.95/ month - visit www.juno.com to sign up today!
Received on Thursday, 6 November 2003 12:33:17 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Wednesday, 5 February 2014 23:39:46 UTC