W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > xml-editor@w3.org > April to June 2000

Re: Possible changes for XML 2nd Edition

From: John Cowan <jcowan@reutershealth.com>
Date: Thu, 25 May 2000 13:22:49 -0400
Message-ID: <392D6169.70E065D2@reutershealth.com>
To: ldodds@ingenta.com
CC: John Cowan <cowan@locke.ccil.org>, xml-dev@xml.org, xml-editor@w3.org
Leigh Dodds wrote:

> Can it be assumed then that the list of possible changes for XML "2nd
> Edition" is separate to any likely outcome of the discussion playing
> out on xml-uri?
> In other words whats the relationship between the two, if any?

None.  Namespaces is not an XML 1.0 concept.  OTOH, the same W3C WG
is responsible for both documents.


Schlingt dreifach einen Kreis um dies! || John Cowan <jcowan@reutershealth.com>
Schliesst euer Aug vor heiliger Schau,  || http://www.reutershealth.com
Denn er genoss vom Honig-Tau,           || http://www.ccil.org/~cowan
Und trank die Milch vom Paradies.            -- Coleridge (tr. Politzer)
Received on Thursday, 25 May 2000 13:23:34 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 20:37:39 UTC