W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > xml-dist-app@w3.org > March 2004

Re: Issue 455 resolution text

From: <noah_mendelsohn@us.ibm.com>
Date: Tue, 2 Mar 2004 10:05:04 -0500
To: Marc Hadley <Marc.Hadley@Sun.COM>
Cc: xml-dist-app@w3.org
Message-ID: <OFC0C475A7.03B8D309-ON85256E4B.004DE22A@lotus.com>

For the record, this was Anish's proposal and I forwarded it.  We have 
agreed a different resolution at the F2F, and it does not use "none".  I 
suspect you will find it acceptable, but I don't have the exact text here. 

Noah Mendelsohn 
IBM Corporation
One Rogers Street
Cambridge, MA 02142

Marc Hadley <Marc.Hadley@Sun.COM>
Sent by: Marc.Hadley@Sun.COM
03/02/2004 09:04 AM

        To:     noah_mendelsohn@us.ibm.com
        cc:     xml-dist-app@w3.org
        Subject:        Re: Issue 455 resolution text

On Mar 2, 2004, at 4:45 AM, noah_mendelsohn@us.ibm.com wrote:
> Issue resolution:
> "If the sender wants a representation header to survive processing at
> SOAP intermediaries (and reach the ultimate destination), it may use 
> the
> SOAP role of 'http://www.w3.org/2003/05/soap-envelope/role/none'. The
> document that specifies the representation header will include text 
> that
> specifies what a SOAP node must do when processing the representation
> header with a role of 
> 'http://www.w3.org/2003/05/soap-envelope/role/none'."
This seems quite wrong to me. Special casing the use of 'none' for the 
Representation header goes against the SOAP processing model - use of 
'none' requests that the header block isn't processed by 
intermediaries. The Representation header should follow normal SOAP 
processing rules. I'm opposed to this resolution.


Marc Hadley <marc.hadley at sun.com>
Web Products, Technologies and Standards, Sun Microsystems.
Received on Tuesday, 2 March 2004 10:07:18 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 22:01:25 UTC