On Mar 2, 2004, at 4:45 AM, noah_mendelsohn@us.ibm.com wrote: > > Issue resolution: > "If the sender wants a representation header to survive processing at > SOAP intermediaries (and reach the ultimate destination), it may use > the > SOAP role of 'http://www.w3.org/2003/05/soap-envelope/role/none'. The > document that specifies the representation header will include text > that > specifies what a SOAP node must do when processing the representation > header with a role of > 'http://www.w3.org/2003/05/soap-envelope/role/none'." > This seems quite wrong to me. Special casing the use of 'none' for the Representation header goes against the SOAP processing model - use of 'none' requests that the header block isn't processed by intermediaries. The Representation header should follow normal SOAP processing rules. I'm opposed to this resolution. Marc. --- Marc Hadley <marc.hadley at sun.com> Web Products, Technologies and Standards, Sun Microsystems.
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Monday, 7 December 2009 10:59:16 GMT