- From: Martin Gudgin <mgudgin@microsoft.com>
- Date: Mon, 15 Sep 2003 11:06:19 -0700
- To: "Elliotte Rusty Harold" <elharo@metalab.unc.edu>, <xml-dist-app@w3.org>
By canonical form I mean as per XML Schema datatypes ( or in this case, the soon to be published errata document ). Apologies for any confusion. Gudge > -----Original Message----- > From: Elliotte Rusty Harold [mailto:elharo@metalab.unc.edu] > Sent: 15 September 2003 18:26 > To: Martin Gudgin; xml-dist-app@w3.org > Subject: Re: XInclude and MTOM > > At 8:31 AM -0700 9/15/03, Martin Gudgin wrote: > > >1. Defined a parse type value of base64Binary that allows binary > >data to be merged into an Infoset. > > > >2. Define whether the character information items merged in 1. are > >to be in canonical form or not. > > Why would this be an issue? Base 64 values only use the ASCII > character set (and not all of that). I think this is always > Unicode normalized. Or did you mean something else by > canonical form? If you're talking about XML canonicalization, > that's not really relevant to the Infoset view. It's very > unclear to me what your concern is. > > -- > > Elliotte Rusty Harold > elharo@metalab.unc.edu > Processing XML with Java (Addison-Wesley, 2002) > http://www.cafeconleche.org/books/xmljava > http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/ISBN%3D0201771861/cafeaulaitA > >
Received on Monday, 15 September 2003 14:06:22 UTC