W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > xml-dist-app@w3.org > September 2003

Re: XInclude and MTOM

From: <noah_mendelsohn@us.ibm.com>
Date: Tue, 16 Sep 2003 12:57:50 -0400
To: daniel@veillard.com
Cc: Elliotte Rusty Harold <elharo@metalab.unc.edu>, Martin Gudgin <mgudgin@microsoft.com>, xml-dist-app@w3.org
Message-ID: <OF382396E3.5FA208E6-ON85256DA3.005D0B86@lotus.com>

Daniel Veillard writes:

>> I will note that:
>>    http://www.w3.org/TR/xmlschema-2/#base64Binary
>> doesn't define itself a lexical representation but reference RFC 2045,
>> so I think it would be simpler if no extraneous rule be applied there
>> (i.e. stick to rfc2045 and not mandate some of the more restrictive 
rfc2049
>> set of rules.)

Note that there is a schema erratum planned that defines a lexical and 
canonical lexical for base64Binary [1].

[1] 
http://www.w3.org/XML/Group/2002/09/xmlschema-2/datatypes-with-errata.html#base64Binary

------------------------------------------------------------------
Noah Mendelsohn                              Voice: 1-617-693-4036
IBM Corporation                                Fax: 1-617-693-8676
One Rogers Street
Cambridge, MA 02142
------------------------------------------------------------------
Received on Tuesday, 16 September 2003 12:59:23 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Monday, 7 December 2009 10:59:15 GMT