W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > xml-dist-app@w3.org > November 2002

Proposal for editorial clarification in part 2, section 4.2.2 RPC Response

From: Henrik Frystyk Nielsen <henrikn@microsoft.com>
Date: Tue, 5 Nov 2002 14:26:59 -0800
Message-ID: <68B95AA1648D1840AB0083CC63E57AD6097C683B@red-msg-06.redmond.corp.microsoft.com>
To: <xml-dist-app@w3.org>
Cc: <fallside@us.ibm.com>

As a minor editorial comment, in part of part 2, section 4.2.2 [1], the
last sentence says

"An RPC response MUST NOT contain both a result and a fault, because a
result indicates success and a fault indicates failure."

This seems to be a leftover from old days: Given the description of
faults as part of the general SOAP model [2], it is impossible to have
the case that a SOAP message can contain a fault and a non-fault body at
the same time. As a result, this MUST requirement seems to be at best
redundant with the general SOAP rules.

I propose to simply delete the sentence. Are there any objections to

Henrik Frystyk Nielsen 

[1] http://www.w3.org/2000/xp/Group/2/06/LC/soap12-part2.xml#rpcresponse
Received on Tuesday, 5 November 2002 17:27:32 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 22:01:22 UTC